• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Is the term Old Covenant ever mentioned in Scripture?

Unless our parents commanded us to observe Sabbath in s certain way right? [i.e. the 5th commandment] We wouldn't need any special guidance to determine if we should obey them or not right?
I hear what you are saying... in my case, I'm the first in my family to keep Shabbat afaik. Maybe since forever...

As to commands from parents, can we honor them without their commands being binding? Mine were not happy when the golden boy who went to seminary left a very conservative pulpit to keep 'that old Jewish law.' I live them and honor them, but their commands are not binding.

In the same vein, lighting candles, saying Brachot, etc are good traditions that help delineate a set apart period of time, but they can never be given the weight of 'command' else we are adding to the very simple observance Abba did command.

We have a few traditions, but I alter them from time to time just to make the pint that the tradition is not law... thoughts?
 
I just want to point out that there is fallacy to think that Instruction given at Sinai didn't exists before Moses and trying to use covenants as a way to void His instructions when it can be proven in scripture many of them (more than just the First 10 Torah Instructions) have been there since Adam.

Genesis 7:2
2 Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.

Genesis 8
20 Then Noah built an altar to Adonai and he took of every clean domestic animal and of every clean flying creature and he offered burnt offerings on the altar. 21 When Adonai smelled the soothing aroma, Adonai said in His heart, “I will never again curse the ground on account of man, even though the inclination of the heart of humankind is evil from youth. Nor will I ever again smite all living creatures, as I have done.

Noah knew what was clean and unclean before God gave him the permission to eat meat. Does any one honestly believe God said hey bring seven pairs of these clean animals and one pair of theses unclean animals, but eat what you want. I'm arbitrarily making a distinction between animals.

Genesis 26:5
Abraham listened to My voice and kept My charge, My mitzvot, My decrees, and My instructions.” 6 So Isaac stayed in Gerar.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Something to think about the Renewed Covenant, Somebody else's work I forget who but checked it out I found no fault in the logic of course if your set against submitting to the instructions of Torah you can probably hobble something together, but I aint mad at cha .

Abraham ‘kept my requirements [ mismarti ], my commands [ miswotay ], my decrees [ huqqotay ] and my laws [ wetorotay ]’ (v. 5).

“It is remarkable that this is precisely the way in which obedience to the Sinai Covenant is expressed in Deuteronomy 11:1: ‘Love the Lord your God and keep his requirements [ mismarto ], his decrees [ huqqotayw ], his laws [ mispatayw ] and his commands [ miswotayw ]’

“Thus Abraham is an example of one who shows the law written on his heart (Jeremiah 31:33). He is the writer’s ultimate example of true obedience to the law, the one about whom the Lord could say, ‘Abraham obeyed me’ (v. 5). Thus, by showing Abraham to be an example of ‘keeping the law,’ the writer has shown the nature of the relationship between the law and faith. Abraham, a man who lived in faith, could be described as one who kept the law”

Thus, Abraham knew a lot more about God’s requirements for and definitions of righteous behavior than most religious teachers give him credit for today. It also means that the laws defining righteous attitudes and behavior that were given to Israel were known and practiced by servants of God long before the Sinai Covenant was ever established.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think you’ve got Romans 7:4 backwards. “Ye are become dead to the law by the body of Christ”. He’s not the only one who died. 6. That being dead wherein we were held . . . 9. When the commandment came, sin revived and I died. 11. . . .and by it(the commandment), (sin) slew me.
Being confined by the Law of Sin and Death, Obligation, Our sinful natures rebellion against God. These aren't the themes of the Romans 7?
You skipped 7 and 8 and stopped at 9, why? Context can be found in the text around what you wrote. Lets look at the whole Chapter.

Romans 7:1

1Or do you not know, brothers and sisters (for I speak to those who know law), that the law is master over a person as long as he lives? 2 For the married woman is bound by law to her husband while he lives; but if the husband dies, she is released from the law concerning the husband. 3 So then, if she is joined to another man while her husband is living, she will be called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is free from the law—so she is not an adulteress, though she is joined to another man.

4 Therefore, my brothers and sisters, you also were made dead to the Torah through the body of Messiah, so that you might be joined to another—the One who was raised from the dead—in order that we might bear fruit for God. 5 For when we were in the flesh, the sinful passions that came through the Torah were working in our body parts to bear fruit for death. 6 But now we have been released from the law, having died to what confined us, so that we serve in the new way of the Ruach and not in the old way of the letter.

7 What shall we say then? Is the Torah sin? May it never be! On the contrary, I would not have known sin except through the Torah. For I would not have known about coveting if the Torah had not said, “You shall not covet.”

8 But sin, taking an opportunity, worked in me through the commandment all kinds of coveting. For apart from the Torah, sin is dead.

9 Once I was alive apart from the Torah; but when the commandment came, sin came to life 10 and I died. The commandment meant for life was found to cause death. 11 Sin, taking an opportunity through the commandment, deceived me and through it killed me. 12 So then, the Torah is holy, and the commandment is holy and righteous and good.

13 Therefore did that which is good become death to me? May it never be! Rather it was sin working death in methrough that which is good—so that sin might be shown to be sin, and that through the commandment sin might become utterly sinful. 14 For we know that the Torah is spiritual; but I am of the flesh, sold to sin. 15 For I do not understand what I am doing—for what I do not want, this I practice; but what I hate, this I do. 16 But if I do what I do not want to do, then I agree with the Torah—that it is good.

17 So now it is no longer I doing it, but sin dwelling in me. 18 For I know that nothing good dwells in me—that is, in my flesh. For to will is present in me, but to do the good is not. 19 For the good that I want, I do not do; but the evil that I do not want, this I practice. 20 But if I do what I do not want, it is no longer I doing it, but sin that dwells in me.

21 So I find the principle—that evil is present in me, the one who wants to do good. 22 For I delight in the Torah of God with respect to the inner man, 23 but I see a different law in my body parts, battling against the law of my mind and bringing me into bondage under the law of sin which is in my body parts. 24 Miserable man that I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death? 25 Thanks be to God—it is through Messiah Yeshua our Lord! So then, with my mind I myself serve the Torah of God; but with my flesh, I serve the law of sin.

Context is all I have to say. I don't see the context as speaking against Torah but against being confined by the Law of Sin and Death, Obligation, and Our sinful natures rebellion against God.

Next statement, My thoughts take 'em or leave 'em. Not directed at anyone or meant to attack someone's theology just so yall understand my thought process a little better. I call no offenseies so no one can be offended.:)

Trying to use Gods instructions to define Covenants is not practical thing because as pointed out earlier many can be proven to exist through all covenants after Adam except the "new" covenant because some want to interpret Yeshua saying obey my commandments as only meaning the first 10. To me, I see this as someone cherry picking what they are willing to submit to. Just like a wife who uses I don't feel convicted to do that so sorry husband I'm not going to submit because it goes against my conviction to not do anything I don't feel convicted to do, but really I'm a good submissive wife. There is no Gospel command to obey the 10 commandments and certainly not a thou shall disregard the rest of Torah. Yeshua said if you love me obey my commandments. If someone's take that its only the commandments he gave as the son, then out goes the ten because he didn't say to keep them. Any reference to them was like the rest of Torah just so we can Identify what sin is. This line of thinking is disturbing to me.
 
Noah knew what was clean and unclean before God gave him the permission to eat meat. Does any one honestly believe God said hey bring seven pairs of these clean animals and one pair of theses unclean animals, but eat what you want. I'm arbitrarily making a distinction between animals.

Hmm. Everything that moves is meat for you. Bring clean animals for sacrifice. Conclusion: I can eat anything that moves but I can only bring clean animals for sacrifice. Easy distinction.
 
Hmm. Everything that moves is meat for you. Bring clean animals for sacrifice. Conclusion: I can eat anything that moves but I can only bring clean animals for sacrifice. Easy distinction.

I will ask you the same question.
 
Thus, Abraham knew a lot more about God’s requirements for and definitions of righteous behavior than most religious teachers give him credit for today. It also means that the laws defining righteous attitudes and behavior that were given to Israel were known and practiced by servants of God long before the Sinai Covenant was ever established.

Thats a great theory, but a lot thin on evidence. No doubt Abraham kept all the Laws of God. I agree with you on that point, however it couldn’t have been the same statutes and laws etc or Galatians 3:16 & 17 would have an opposite effect.

Galatians 3:16-17
Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
 
I will ask you the same question.
This assumes that holiness comes from eating or not eating certain things. Yet as God is holy and doesnt eat anything lets do that.

1 Tim 4:3 Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.
For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.
 
This assumes that holiness comes from eating or not eating certain things. Yet as God is holy and doesnt eat anything lets do that.

Yeshua himself is our example 1 John 2:3-6 and he most certainly did eat...

1 Tim 4:3 Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.
For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
For it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer.

The fallacy here is assuming that all meats are what God has created to be received with thanksgiving. We have clear statements in scripture that say otherwise.
 
Yeshua himself is our example 1 John 2:3-6 and he most certainly did eat...



The fallacy here is assuming that all meats are what God has created to be received with thanksgiving. We have clear statements in scripture that say otherwise.

And yet that passage specifically states all/every creature. No restrictions. Sounds like a Noahide dietary command.
 
Everything that moves is meat for you.
I am going to put that in the “To be determined” category. I don’t think that we have enough answers at this point. It just doesn’t make sense any which way.
 
Hmm. Everything that moves is meat for you. Bring clean animals for sacrifice. Conclusion: I can eat anything that moves but I can only bring clean animals for sacrifice. Easy distinction.
3 Every crawling thing that is alive will be food for you, as are the green plants—I have now given you everything.

Sometimes literal application without making distinction is not they way to go.

All green plants are given to you as well, Rosary Pea, Castor Bean, Daphne, Jimson Weed, Poison Hemlock and many more green plants that are fatal to eat.
Easy distinction. Somethings weren't meant to be eaten.

An if you want to just take the literal words said with no thought to the distinction between clean and unclean that God made then do so by taking the literal words written not the interpretation to make it easier to understand translation.

Its: every crawling thing that has life will be of judgement for you.

So sure, you can literally say its your judgement to eat anything that crawls. Not flys, walks, or swims.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Did anybody get this ^^^^^^^
Got it, was hoping that you weren’t going there.
I can only say that at the beginning of the process he was without blemish.
 
:D It’s actually extremely restrictive. It’s gotta be pretty rare!:rolleyes: Cant eat it if its alive and cant eat it if its not moving.
You would make a vegan proud!;)o_O
 
Part of my point with the Leviticus 22 passage is that both David and Isaiah prophesy that he will be unacceptable per this verse. Both of them Old Testament Prophets with a capital P

Are they spiting Torah? Or perhaps this makes them not a prophet?
 
This assumes that holiness comes from eating or not eating certain things

This seems to indicate exactly that. I highly recommend reading the whole chapter.

Leviticus 11:44-47 NASB
[44] For I am the LORD your God. Consecrate yourselves therefore, and be holy, for I am holy. And you shall not make yourselves unclean with any of the swarming things that swarm on the earth. [45] For I am the LORD who brought you up from the land of Egypt to be your God; thus you shall be holy, for I am holy.'" [46] This is the law regarding the animal and the bird, and every living thing that moves in the waters and everything that swarms on the earth, [47] to make a distinction between the unclean and the clean, and between the edible creature and the creature which is not to be eaten.

Oh and the only other time in scripture this is mentioned is in context of the sabbath along with other commandments...

Leviticus 19:1-4 NASB
[1] Then the LORD spoke to Moses, saying: [2] "Speak to all the congregation of the sons of Israel and say to them, 'You shall be holy, for I the LORD your God am holy. [3] Every one of you shall reverence his mother and his father, and you shall keep My sabbaths; I am the LORD your God. [4] Do not turn to idols or make for yourselves molten gods; I am the LORD your God.

These are the passages that Peter is pointing those believers to when he is teaching them what there behavior should be... that phrase “be ye holy for I am holy” isn’t found anywhere else in scripture.

1 Peter 1:13-16 NASB
[13] Therefore, prepare your minds for action, keep sober in spirit, fix your hope completely on the grace to be brought to you at the revelation of Jesus Christ. [14] As obedient children, do not be conformed to the former lusts which were yours in your ignorance, [15] but like the Holy One who called you, be holy yourselves also in all your behavior; [16] because it is written, "You SHALL BE HOLY, FOR I AM HOLY."
 
Leviticus 22:24. Ye shall not offer unto the LORD that which is bruised, or crushed, or broken, or cut; neither shall ye make any offering thereof in your land.

Thoughts? @Pacman
 
Leviticus 22:24. Ye shall not offer unto the LORD that which is bruised, or crushed, or broken, or cut; neither shall ye make any offering thereof in your land.

Thoughts? @Pacman

Leviticus 22:24 NASB
[24] Also anything with its testicles bruised or crushed or torn or cut, you shall not offer to the LORD, or sacrifice in your land,

Not sure what you are referencing? Nor do I understand how this impacts the instructions given to us... please explain.
 
First the Context, They were trying to justify righteousness through works not Faith. They were relying on Torah for salvation not Yeshua. not instruction on how to avoid sin. Trying to get to heaven through acts. It points to obligation and consequences and reliance on that. If it is looked through the lens that Torah is not a good thing, not holy, a bad thing, no longer what teaches us what sin is and how to avoid it thus null and gone it creates a contradiction in scripture. Then those lenses need to be changed Now we can sit here and pick it apart Galatians and two step with our beliefs from now until the Battle of Gog Magog if you want. I've already stated my position that its Abrahams Covenant that was renewed Galatians makes my point. I've already said that Abraham followed God Torah. I've mentioned multiple times that Messianic prophecy points to the things that would be different under the Melkziedek Priesthood when it was renewed. Unless you show be a clear instruction not to follow Torah or that its written for me to not eat kosher (I'm not talking about what is used to justify not following kosher because even if that interpretation was right its not an instruction not to eat kosher) we just going to ping pong scripture. Galatians says even with a man’s covenant, once it has been confirmed, no one cancels it or adds to it. So all the covenants are still in place. You like the wedding analogy so do I but here's how I see it. The Groom has yet to collect His bride He's still preparing a place. We are betrothed to Him so we are not free to marry another. If we stray from Him it is adultery. We are still under our Master ,who dedicated us for His son, authority until His son comes to collect us and takes us to the place He prepared. Now I can choose to rebel against my Master but I choose to submit to His Son who said to Love His father and obey His Father. :DLike the Concubine Polygyny reference?:D

Galatians 3


3 O foolish Galatians, who cast a spell on you? Before your eyes Yeshua the Messiah was clearly portrayed as crucified. 2 I want to find out just one thing from you: did you receive the Ruach by deeds based on Torah, or by hearing based on trust? 3 Are you so foolish? After beginning with the Ruach, will you now reach the goal in the flesh? 4 Did you endure so much for nothing—if it really was for nothing? 5 So then, the One who gives you the Ruach and works miracles among you—does He do it because of your deeds based on Torah or your hearing based on trust and faithfulness?


6 Just as Abraham “believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,” 7 know then that those who have faith are children of Abraham. 8 The Scriptures, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, proclaimed the Good News to Abraham in advance, saying, “All the nations shall be blessed through you.” 9 So then, the faithful are blessed along with Abraham, the faithful one.


10 For all who rely on the deeds of Torah are under a curse—for the Scriptures say, “Cursed is everyone who does not keep doing everything written in the scroll of the Torah.” 11 It is clear that no one is set right before God by Torah, for “the righteous shall live by emunah.” 12 However, Torah is not based on trust and faithfulness; on the contrary, “the one who does these things shall live by them.”13 Messiah liberated us from Torah’s curse, having become a curse for us (for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree”— 14 in order that through Messiah Yeshua the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles, so we might receive the promise of the Ruach through trusting faith.

15 Brothers and sisters, I speak in human terms: even with a man’s covenant, once it has been confirmed, no one cancels it or adds to it. 16 Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. It doesn’t say, “and to seeds,” as of many, but as of one, “and to your seed,” who is the Messiah. 17 What I am saying is this: Torah, which came 430 years later, does not cancel the covenant previously confirmed by God, so as to make the promise ineffective. 18 For if the inheritance is based on law, it is no longer based on a promise. But God has graciously given it to Abraham by means of a promise.


19 Then why the Torah? It was added because of wrongdoings until the Seed would come—to whom the promise had been made. It was arranged through angels by the hand of an intermediary. 20 Now an intermediary is not for one party alone—but God is one. 21 Then is the Torah against the promises of God? May it never be! For if a law had been given that could impart life, certainly righteousness would have been based on law. 22 But the Scripture has locked up the whole world under sin, so that the promise based on trust in Messiah Yeshua might be given to those who trust.


23 Now before faith came, we were being guarded under Torah—bound together until the coming faith would be revealed. 24 Therefore the Torah became our guardian to lead us to Messiah, so that we might be made right based on trusting. 25 But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian. 26 For you are all sons of God through trusting in Messiah Yeshua. 27 For all of you who were immersed in Messiah have clothed yourselves with Messiah. 28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female—for you are all one in Messiah Yeshua. 29 And if you belong to Messiah, then you are Abraham’s seed—heirs according to the promise.
 
Back
Top