Is someone arguing for Calvanism?
I love the awe and Glee of the people when they really really understand that satan is actually defeated. And how they marvel that they actually we're afraid of him.16 They that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee, and consider thee, saying, Is this the man that made the earth to tremble, that did shake kingdoms;
17 That made the world as a wilderness, and destroyed the cities thereof; that opened not the house of his prisoners?
in the garden of Eden with the serpent that Christianity as a whole asserts was Satan in disguise.
but no doubt is initiated by Satan much like he attempted with Christ in Matthew 4. In this passage, Christ names him as a tempter, a devil (diablos) and Satan (Satanas). As the passage lays out, this devil has the ability to teleport himself and another, and apparently has ownership over the kingdoms of the world.
When satan took Jesus up on the high mount and offered him all the kingdoms. Jesus does not dispute the ownership of the kingdoms. And it seems to be accepted Satan had the power to offer what was under his authority.
8 Again, the devil taketh him up into an exceeding high mountain, and sheweth him all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them;
9 And saith unto him, All these things will I give thee, if thou wilt fall down and worship me.
10 Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.
Have you ever noticed that after the children of Israel were slaves in Egypt the word was a synonym for bondage? “Babylon” likewise is the system that seeks to exalt man above God and rule man in place of God. The stones of fire (precious stones) are representative of the tribes of Israel.
I guess YHWH’s curse didn’t stick? Because Satan is walking up and down in the earth! Shouldn’t he be crawling on his belly???
I find it incredibly enlightening what was not offered. Satan didn’t offer Christ the world, as that doesn’t belong to him. Only the kingdoms.
Which seriously makes me question the idea of patriotism as it is currently associated with one of those kingdoms. Would patriotism by definition not be more accurately defined as loyalty to a patriarchal tribe instead of a kingdom?
Even acknowledging the metaphorical symbolism of Satan, I don't see how that precludes a literal Satan.
Again I would go read Daniel when the Prince of Persia was holding up presumably Gabriel from delivering the Answer to Daniel's Prayer. A human Prince isn't going to hold up an Angel. But a Prince Spirit could. This Spirit was not Satan but on his own was so powerful that "Michael your Prince" had to get involved.We find that the King of Tyrus had a son that was the prince of Tyrus. A very puffed up prince that thought himself a god. YHWH tells him plainly through the prophet that he is NOT a god, he is a man. His death is promised and in verse 9 he is again told a second time that he is a MAN. Then it moves on to the lamentation against the king of Tyrus. It should be clear that if his son is a man, and YHWH called him a man, that the father is just a man, especially since his death is also foretold. That Hebrew word translated created also means chosen, and it makes sense that since YHWH set this king to be a covering (protection) to the people that his sin in getting rich through traffic ended his reign. “Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God.” The use of this phrase is descriptive. Have you ever noticed that after the children of Israel were slaves in Egypt the word was a synonym for bondage? “Babylon” likewise is the system that seeks to exalt man above God and rule man in place of God. The stones of fire (precious stones) are representative of the tribes of Israel. The Cherub had wings spread over the mercy seat of the ark, so likewise, a king placed by YHWH had a protective roll over the people of God. “Thou was upon the Holy mountain of God.” Mountain in prophesy is nation. Do you see this yet? “So I will cast thee as profane out of the mountain of God.” This king was cut off and thrown down. Verse 19 “And all they that know thee among the people shall be astonished at thee: Thou shalt be a terror, and never shalt thou be anymore” So this satan died and will be no more.
Ephesians 6:12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.Our battle is not against flesh and blood. It is against ideologies, false doctrines and value systems that are contrary to and in total opposition to what YHWH authorized and established.
I guess YHWH’s curse didn’t stick? Because Satan is walking up and down in the earth! Shouldn’t he be crawling on his belly???
The serpent stills crawls on its belly and will forever.
So does that mean the tales of dragons come from pre-fall times?
I think they lived before Adam just after Genesis 1:1 but before Genesis 1:2. I think when Satan fell to earth the old world was destroyed with dinosaurs in it and Genesis 1:2 God is remaking it.Scientist Richard Owen invented the term “dinosaurs” in 1841 for describing the large creatures that once lived on earth. But for most of human history these creatures were known as dragons and they were part of the original creation. The many dragon stories and legends that can be found around the world are probably related to actual encounters with dinosaurs. Since we are told in Genesis that there were two of every kind of animal that went on the Ark before the Flood, dinosaurs must have come off the Ark and only become extinct sometime after that.
Even acknowledging the metaphorical symbolism of Satan, I don't see how that precludes a literal Satan.
This could be worthy of further study another time. My initial thought is that the curse on the snake was to remind man of the subtle ways that he convinces himself to give in to the lusts of the flesh/the things that tempt him.If Eve's (metaphorical lust) tempted her to question God, accuse Him of being a liar, and disobey Him so she could be wise like Him; how did the curse change anything?
I actually started writing a book on some of these thoughts. The way God operates is a lot like Persians in the Bible with their laws. Once God establishes a law he will not break it. In the beginning God gave man dominion over the earth. When man fell he gave dominion of earth over to Satan. That is why Satan in the New testament is able to offer it back to Jesus. It was his because we gave it to him in the garden. God didn't just come to die on the cross and reconcile us to himself. He also came to give us back our dominion....
Do you have any scriptural references to support this claim?In the beginning God gave man dominion over the earth. When man fell he gave dominion of earth over to Satan.
You might double check your facts here. Multiple places in scripture says that the earth is the Lords and the fullness thereof. And the offer Satan made to Christ was not the earth.
If you are correct that God gave dominion over the earth to Satan, I would definitely be interested in s
Anyways , point is we were given dominion in the beginning but we gave it to Satan when we fell.
We also have to be careful not to get into a Gnostic, dualistic frame of reference when referencing the Adversary; he is not a counterpoint to God nor a fallen angel in rebellion (a mistaken belief within Christianity that traces back to a play [Paradise Lost] written by John Milton, who demonstrated in his Systematic Theology that he knew full well the actual truth about evil). Satan/Lucifer/the Devil/Adversary is just another part of God's Creation, purposefully created to play the major role he plays.
John Milton in Paradise Lost[edit]
Until John Milton created the character of Satan for his Paradise Lost [1667], the different attributes of Satan were usually ascribed to different entities. The angel who rebelled in Heaven was not the same as the ruler in Hell. The ruler of Hell was often seen as a sort of jailer who never fell from grace. The tempting serpent of Genesis was just a serpent. Milton combined the different parts of the character to show his fall from near-divine beauty and grace to his eventual skulking role as a jealous tempter. He was so successful in his characterization of Satan as a romantic hero who "would rather rule in Hell than serve in Heaven" that his version of Satan has displaced all others.