@FollowingHim I have gone back and reread your post s couple times. That REALLY needs slight expansion into a paper for this forum and that I can put on several blogs. It is a great 'reframe' that needs exposure.
Please put it somewhere where we can refer others to it and also copy and paste it into messages. It's simple, clear, and easily understood AND worth others reading.Feel free to do what you like with it @PeteR.
Thankyou for your help everyone. That post is now top of the list when I browse to it without being logged in, thanks to all the likes & comments. It is also encouraging that the first 7 posts are all pro-polygamy, and the vast majority overall are too. This is giving a very clear message to both viewers and ministry staff. The staff won't listen, but viewers may.Over on YouTube, I've tried to cut to the heart of the matter and directly address God's love of women, rather than getting bogged down in technicalities. I personally think this would be a good post for viewers to see early on, as it is aimed at changing the heart attitude. Most of the other responses have been more technical, and these are good. But most viewers are not yet ready to engage on that level, and need to have a better view of the overall picture first.
If you agree, I would appreciate it if you would like and/or reply to this post. Enough interaction with it should make it float to the top so it is more likely to become people's first impression. Then those who wish to dig deeper will scroll on and see all the technical scriptural discussion.
They will remove anything that has hyperlinks, per stated policy. I added a comment with a link to a PolygamyHQ video, that was removed, so I created a new comment telling viewers to "Google it".Thankyou for your help everyone. That post is now top of the list when I browse to it without being logged in, thanks to all the likes & comments. It is also encouraging that the first 7 posts are all pro-polygamy, and the vast majority overall are too. This is giving a very clear message to both viewers and ministry staff. The staff won't listen, but viewers may.
I've added a pointer to this website in a comment on that post, so hopefully that will be useful to someone.
@FollowingHim put "DOT COM" Which is usually good.They will remove anything that has hyperlinks, per stated policy. I added a comment with a link to a PolygamyHQ video, that was removed, so I created a new comment telling viewers to "Google it".
We do risk inviting those who would try to destroy us, but that may be the next level.
I am in full agreement with you that we cannot hide, but I was unaware that this line was in our National Anthem until I looked it up. Yikes!I think it is the next level. The wrong doctrines need to be countered by people of faith.
I doubt many would care enough to put out effort to try and destroy. They lack truth, and that impacts their conviction level big time!
Kinda like the verse from our National Anthem that sings about how "No refuge could save the hireling and slave from the terror of flight or the gloom of the grave"
We have a superior weapon...TRUTH!
"Quit ye like men. Be strong." (King James)
"Fear not" appears enough times in the scripture to give us a different verse every day of the year telling us the same thing.
There is a prophesied famine happening now....not of bread, but of hearing the word of YHWH.
We know the truth of how our God sees marriage. Let's proclaim it to anyone willing to hear! The world needs truth, and all creation is waiting for the sons of Yah to be revealed. Real patriarchs inspire others. If Yah be for us, who can be against us? No weapon formed against you will prosper. So many encouraging things in His word. Encouraging things in our home too. This is on the wall.
Living faith.
Doubt sees the obstacles, faith sees the way.
Doubt sees the darkest night, faith sees the day.
Doubt fears to take one step, faith soars on high.
Doubt questions "Who believes?" Faith answers "I."
I pray Yah protects the good plural families.....but I know He already does too.
Yeah... I just love poking the dragon... time to go nitey nite before I get snarky with the sheeple... lol!You're right. I cannot understand YouTube's logic, their placement algorithm makes no sense, the top comment has only 2 likes and one reply. It's a black box deliberately. Still, the general vibe of the comments section is pro-polygamy!
I think it would be hard to prove the verse is referencing African Americans. But even if it was is it really racist? A slave that believed the tyrant using them to wage war on his other subjects would treat them right or give them true freedom would be deluding himself. A bigger cage is not freedom. I doubt the colonists felt any better toward any other enemy of any other color. It was WAR! It could have just been talking about how the truly free men in the colonies viewed those under King George. Hireling was in reference to the mercenaries George paid to come against the colonists because he probably lacked sufficient support from the English who were reluctant to wage war on their own. The man fighting for money wants to live to spend it. The man fighting for liberty and the ability to control his substance (king George wanted all goods sent back to, and only traded with, England) and the opportunity to give his children an inheritance of substance and freedom he has SAND. He is fighting for something precious.I am in full agreement with you that we cannot hide, but I was unaware that this line was in our National Anthem until I looked it up. Yikes!
https://www.pri.org/stories/2016-08-30/historians-disagree-whether-star-spangled-banner-racist