Since you haven’t brought any of his arguments to the table, all we have is your opinions.My position in this case is same as Gary North who has done more Bible based research.So you aren't going against me alone, you also have to defeat Gary's arguments.
Also I know usury history in Medieval Europe. Church did try to forbid any payment of interest. It has failed because interest is emergent property of human nature and this world. You can't stop it, only force it underground.
@rockfox, @steve
Have you considered than incorrect beliefs about economics are clouding your beliefs about Scripture? Another reason could be because modern monetary system and laws does favor bankers.
I didn't appeal to any economists or Gary North. I know enough of economics to derive conclusions myself.You like your appeals to authority. Economists. Gary North. I've lived and observed long enough to realize modern economics isn't all it's cracked up to be. My beliefs discussed here came from personal search of the scriptures on the question of debt, not from economics beliefs. Only later did I increasingly realize the folly and fraud in modern economics and it's purposes for our banker overlords.
I have asked you 5 Biblical question and I have received only one answer. I haven't received explanation why in Parable of Talent Jesus in OK with money lending? You claim this is sin.As a servant of Christ I take my opinion from the scriptures, not what economic theorists, who are often wrong, believe. History and present events are bearing out the profitability of that approach. I give you a verse prohibiting debt and your retort is the economists say that can't work? They are your authority.
There is zero proof that they were lending to fellow Jews.I haven't received explanation why in Parable of Talent Jesus in OK with money lending? You claim this is sin.
Adultery would never be used as example what to do because it sin.There is zero proof that they were lending to fellow Jews.
They were occupied by Roman forces and we have evidence that they gambled. It’s not much of a stretch to believe that they borrowed against their coming pay.
There were also other peoples about.
Also, why here exist limiter to only poor people:
Thou shalt not give him money upon usury, nor lend him victuals [food -- "vittles"] for increase (Leviticus 25:37).
Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother: usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury (Deuteronomy 23:19).
Again verses directly against your claim.
No lending (or 'commerce,' period) of fake, fiat 'dollars' -- since they are a dishonest weight -- possibly COULD.No commercial lending in the US meets the restrictions in either the OT or NT.
These contradict me how? As I said, there are limits upon lending in the Bible which basically make it uneconomic as a commercial enterprise. It was meant for helping your neighbor. No commercial lending in the US meets the restrictions in either the OT or NT.
Topic isn't sound money, but usury. Not connected.No lending (or 'commerce,' period) of fake, fiat 'dollars' -- since they are a dishonest weight -- possibly COULD.
Sorry, but are you KIDDING? 'Unsound' NOT-money is the very basis of the entire, fetid, stinking, unconstitutional, and abomination-based system (His Word) that is CREATED from usury.Topic isn't sound money, but usury. Not connected.
Issue is interest rate greater than 0% sin or not. My position it is not. There is also 0% charity loan for poor people.Sorry, but are you KIDDING? 'Unsound' NOT-money is the very basis of the entire, fetid, stinking, unconstitutional, and abomination-based system (His Word) that is CREATED from usury.
Issue is interest rate greater than 0% sin or not...
Topic isn't sound money, but usury. Not connected.
26 But his master answered him, ‘You wicked and slothful servant! You knew that I reap where I have not sown and gather where I scattered no seed? 27 Then you ought to have invested my money with the bankers, and at my coming I should have received what was my own with interest. 28 So take the talent from him and give it to him who has the ten talents.
Verse 27 is key. Jesus expects collecting interest. So commercial lending, whose purpose is to earn money is OK.
And if you lend to those from whom you hope to receive back, what credit is that to you? For even sinners lend to sinners to receive as much back. But love your enemies, do good, and lend, hoping for nothing in return; and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High.
Sorry, but no. 0% on "abomination" is what, compounded?
You can't charge "interest" on stolen property. The issue isn't math, it's rebellion: theft. and building upon it.
Just because current monetary system is debt based, doesn't mean they are all. Ancient and medieval monetary system were metal based and question of usury has existed. Not the same topic.They could hardly be less connected. Usury is the entire basis of our monetary system and the creation of our money.
No.Spoken like a banker. Do you work in the finance industry?
You do abuse to the parable, taking literally the example of a master who was "a hard man, reaping where you did not sow, and gathering from where you did not scatter." as justification. This is a parable, and not about money. And to the extent it is about money, those details aren't how God asks us to use money.
I don't see a problem here. There are commercial loans for money and charity loans for good acts. Charity is mandatory only for poor.How is commercial lending for profit, with interest, liens, mortgages, repossessions and the like "hoping for nothing in return"? You can't get there from here.
I've been thinking about polygamy in light of the principle set forth in this verse.
"To the pure all things are pure, but to those who are defiled and unbelieving nothing is pure; but even their mind and conscience are defiled." (Titus 1:15 NKJV)
The man (or woman) who has his heart and mind set on the Lord Jesus Christ, and our Father in Heaven is pure. This man seeks to serve and please his Master, not himself. He lives by faith. His heart is set on the love of God, and love of neighbor. Since the man is pure in heart, everything is pure for him.
There are also other men (and women), men who do not fear God, men who do not trust, hope in, and follow Jesus Christ. These men seek to gratify themselves. They seek their own benefit even when doing so harms others. This man acts as though he himself is the center of the universe. He walks in fear, pride, covetousness, and ultimately despair. He may claim to have faith, but it isn't genuine. Nothing is pure for this man.
I take the "everything" described in this passage to pertain to the "everything of normal life", and do not believe it to include specific things forbidden by God.
Homosexuality is fundamentally evil. It cannot be pure no matter what the state of one's heart. Likewise, adultery is always wrong, as are murder, the dishonoring of father and mother, and many other prohibited things.
Most things are lawful. These lawful things will be pure for the pure man, but still impure to the unclean man. In short, the impure man sins even when doing those things that are generally lawful.
The pure man may drink alcohol, while exercising moderation, self control, and praising God. The impure will misuse and abuse alcohol.
The pure man will eat his food with a thankful heart, praising God. The impure man sins in his eating, since his delight is solely in the food itself, and not the Giver of the food.
The pure man works hard, saves and invests money wisely, and shares generously, because he knows his Father in Heaven cares for him. The faithless man sets his hope on money. He trusts money to keep him safe, and give him the things his soul desires. This man does evil even in his working, saving, investing, and giving.
I think marriage and family also fit this category. The pure man fixes his eyes on the Lord Jesus Christ. He loves, provides for, protects, and leads his family.
If he has one wife, he will delight in her and love her as Christ loved the Church. If the Lord chooses to give him more than one wife, then he will thank God for each of them, and seek to reflect Christ in the way he leads each one individually, and the whole family corporately.
The pure man serves God when single, if he has one wife, if he has more than one, if his wife or wives leave him, or if she/or they die. Whatever his circumstances, the pure man will serve God.
The faithless man offends God when he is single. He offends God when he has one wife. He offends God if he has multiple wives. He offends God in divorce, and offends Gof in death. Whatever his circumstances, the impure man does evil. The impure man even transgresses when doing generally lawful things.
We should all examine our own hearts and lives to see whether we are walking by faith, as pure men.
I believe as long as you honor GOD’s calling in your life and follow his will. When we go out searching for things of our own. “More than one wife.” that is when we disobey. The wives will come to the honest and pure man.What is exactly dishonest weight?
I consider this to be more like merchant setting his scale to 10 kg when correct value is 9 kg.
You don't know how much murderes are popular with ladies?The wives will come to the honest and pure man.
I believe as long as you honor GOD’s calling in your life and follow his will. When we go out searching for things of our own. “More than one wife.” that is when we disobey. The wives will come to the honest and pure man.
How about just the honest?I believe as long as you honor GOD’s calling in your life and follow his will. When we go out searching for things of our own. “More than one wife.” that is when we disobey. The wives will come to the honest and pure man.