Yes, you have stated my position well.I think I understand your position correctly now. What you are saying is that we don't have to perfectly understand everything to be saved. However, when presented with the truth, we must accept the truth with certainty, as if we certainly believe the opposite of truth, we have rejected God's Word and therefore rejected God. However, if we are unsure about something, we should avoid coming to a firm conclusion and not state one way or the other, because then we have not rejected God's word. It is perfectly acceptable to be uneducated and have little knowledge of God - we just have to accept the correct view on the matters we do focus on. It is only if we clearly reject the truth in any area that God has revealed to us that we will not be saved. I think that is a fair summary of your position, if I am wrong correct me.
Erm. How does Scripture describe salvation according to your interpretation?Most importantly, I can't see it in scripture. Scripture seems to indicate salvation is far simpler than this.
That might be the reason why the Book of Phillipian asked us to work out our salvation with fear and trembling? Philippians 2:12, "It expects too much perfection. Humans make mistakes. We will be wrong sometimes. If we lose our salvation for firmly believing something that turns out to have been a mistake, who can be saved? How could we ever have assurance of salvation, since the possibility remains that we might be wrong somewhere?
12So then, my beloved, just as you have always obeyed, not as in my presence only, but now much more in my absence, work out your salvation with fear and trembling; 13for it is God who is at work in you, both to will and to work for His good pleasure."
This does suggest some work to be done on the part of the Believers themselves.
Do you have Scriptual backing for firmly believing in something false but yet still get saved?
I don't agree with this. What we are shown by God, we are 100% sure - God made it EVIDENT to us This makes us passionate about what we are sure. For example, when your forum opened my eyes about polygyny and when I am sure it IS biblical, it made me passionate about speaking out the truth and living the truth. I tell everyone it IS the truth despite their immense skepticism. But I don't preach anything about infant baptism because I am not sure. Does it make me lukewarm? I don't think so. You can see the fire for the truth in the eyes of many on biblicalfamilies.org because they have been exposed to the truth.It incentivises lukewarmness. If taking a firm stand on something risks the possibility that we might be taking a firm stand in the wrong direction and therefore lose our salvation, it is safer to take NO firm stands on anything, and to not investigate anything deeply enough to form a firm opinion. But we are told in Revelation to be cold or hot, but not lukewarm. In Revelation, it is the lukewarm who are rejected, while both the cold and hot (ie those in completely opposite but fervent positions) who are saved.
If you reject it and haven't repented before you die, I think the answer is yes: this highly likely might result in a loss of salvation, unfortunately.But, does failing that test always result in a loss of salvation? That goes a step further.