• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Hashing out the two first wives.

What you just described is about oposite what PeteR alleged, that caused me to ask the above question.
Enemies of Yeshua spread false teaching, yes, but it was not corrupted christian doctrines that caused those back then to reject him.

Those corrupted "christian" doctrines are the same falsehoods as were used back then. Different source but the same lie. Back then it was used to put people to death and deceive the Jews so they wouldn't follow him. The same thing is happening today minus the putting people to death part. Same lie new face.
 
Eph. 2:14-18
14For He Himself is our peace, who has made both one, and has broken down the middle wall of separation, 15having abolished in His flesh the enmity, that is,the law of commandments contained in ordinances, so as to create in Himself one new man from the two, thus making peace, 16and that He might reconcile them both to God in one body through the cross, thereby putting to death the enmity. 17And He came and preached peace to you who were afar off and to those who were near. 18For through Him we both have access by one Spirit to the Father.
Gal. 3:26For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. 27For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. 28There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus. 29And if you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.

These seem to be speaking in a present tense about unity between the remnant of both houses.

So I agree with your conclusion.

One of the things we agreed upon in the beginning was that we were only going to talk about the remnant. Trying to all of Judah and all of Israel is really going to get complicated. Judah (Jews) and Israel (Gentiles) who do not believe in Christ are not part of the Bride, from my way of thinking. There are even some believers of both houses that do not fit. The joining of the remnant is being done now under Christ.
 
This is a great discussion and I am encouraged that we are tackling this without contention. Praise Yah.

I agree and I also think the discussion about the community and the elders fits right in with how all this should turn out.

Indeed, Jeremiah is told to smash a pot beyond repair to illustrate how thoroughly the judgment from the Babylonians would be. And, it was. Your statement implies that Jerusalem will never be made again, but that is not the message of Jeremiah to Jerusalem. God clearly says that Jerusalem will be rebuilt. See the following from Jeremiah (other prophets echo the same message, Isaiah, Zechariah 14, etc):
  • 30:3 Israel and Judah will be brought back. Following verses give great detail
  • 31 speaks primarily to Ephraim (Israel) in the first half, but Judah is taken up in vss 23 and specifically mentioned in 27 and 31...
  • 33:10ff specifically speaks of the restoration of Judah and Jerusalem, also vs. 13-26 are very clear that two families (v.24) will be restored. Jerusalem is specifically mentioned multiple times.
This is not to say Jerusalem won't be disciplined again, I think she will, but God is clear, over and over that Jerusalem is where the King will sit. And, He intends to make her the crown jewel of the world.

One of the things we have to remember is that when it is spoken about Jerusalem it is referring to two Jerusalem. The context could very well imply that one Jerusalem is going to be destroyed and another is going to be rebuild that is total separate. One earthly and one heavenly. This is all a future event so we will have to wait and see. In the meantime I don't really see how the story being told in Jeremiah about the pots being smashed is God saying, "if you guys don't straighten up this is gong to be really really bad." He is prophesying the destruction of something never to rebuild again. Because it is contrasted with reworking of the moist clay that can be molded. There is a message here.

God's crown jewel is not a city/temple on earth but a Heavenly temple.

But, and I know this is going to probably going to go the wrong way, there more than likely is going to be a temple claiming to be of God, but it is not going to be what it appears. (Take that with a grain of salt.)

This is partly false. Adhering to the Law brought blessing. You admit that. It was when they disobeyed the Law that they brought curses. Yeshua didn't come to free them from the Law, He came to free them from the curses of disobedience. The Law itself is easy... The bondage comes from additions to (or subtractions from) the Law. The Law itself is very simple. God Himself said, as @Pacman pointed out that 'it is not too difficult for you.' Paul even invokes that very statement in an argument to take the simple Torah, not all the manmade additions.

To be clear, the Law doesn't save, it brings blessing. Salvation has always been by grace through faith. If a person's faith was in their actions, then it was in the wrong place. Their faith, and ours, must be in Yah and His Messiah, Yeshua. Abraham believed God (Genesis 15:6) but he 'kept My laws, My statutes and My commandments..' (Genesis 26:5) Did he keep it for salvation or did he keep it because he was saved?

Yes, and I will say it again, the Law is a blessing. But, it's not like it is a blessing as in a reward for doing good, it is a blessing because it is the right way to live. Like eating food that is good for you, it is a blessing to you because it is meant for you to live that way. I do question your insistence on the Law though, the Law's purpose was to reveal sin. (Sometimes I wonder if its an idol of some sort.) And we needed sin to be revealed so we would know why we need a Savior. So, in essence the purpose of the Law was to bring Salvation. And in it we are blessed. Again, I think there is misunderstanding about what I am saying, the Law is good, man's interpretation of the Law is bad.

Abraham had an understanding of the Law that we do not at this time. The only thing we have is mans interpretation of the Law. I will explain more in response to you next comment.

The physical and the spiritual are inextricably connected. We are spiritual beings in physical bodies. It is quite hard to learn deeper spiritual meaning without doing the physical commandments. For example, I read about Passover and Sukkot and had a 'book knowledge' but not until we began doing it did the real learning and understanding come. In non-Torah terms, do you want a Doctor that read about how to do a certain surgery explaining the finer points, or do you want a surgeon who has done it... multiple times? Or, still another way, Yeshua was without sin. Did He get that way by not keeping the commandments? Or, did He keep them?

So, I'm not interested in telling you or anyone else how to keep the commandments, but I gladly proclaim that God doesn't change and His ways remain the same and His own Word, (Deuteronomy 13) says if anyone leads you away from the commandments, they are to be stoned. (In modern vernacular, I just don't listen to them, then counsel rebellion.)

This is a perfect example of what I am trying to say. I think I understand what you are saying to be, you studied the Law of Passover and Sukkot and it was head knowledge, but when you started practicing it, it became real to you. Correct? You are now a doctor of Passover now :) . Then you say that because you understand it for YOU that means that you can explain it to others. I may listen to your experience, and I may feel deep inside a conviction to do at as you say and it be all good. But, I may listen to what you say and I may say that's nice for you but it's not for me, I need to find a better interpretation. Does that make me wrong? Is that implying to you that I don't believe in following the Law?

Now, if the Son of God comes and reveals to me what keeping the commands really means, then for sure, if I am being lead by Him, I am going to do it that way.

So, again, following the Law is not the problem, it's the understanding of it from God's point of view that makes it right. No man can tell another man how to follow the Law. And I can tell you, any attempts to force it on any person will only do the opposite. There is a reason God says HE is going to write it on someone's heart.

And, a final note, keeping the Torah of Moses doesn't make one Jewish. It makes one righteous. It is the equivalent of doing what Yeshua did.

I agree with you. It's being lead to the correct interpretation that matters.

My most sincere prayer is that God will come down and show us how to live our lives pleasing to Him. An I know that a major part of that is understanding His Laws and finding joy in doing them. I know that is the only blessing we need.
 
But, and I know this is going to probably going to go the wrong way, there more than likely is going to be a temple claiming to be of God, but it is not going to be what it appears.

I fully agree with this point. The next temple / tabernacle I believe will not be legit. I do however believe there will be a legit one at some point before the New Jerusalem.

the Law's purpose was to reveal sin.

This is a major oversimplification! The purpose of the Torah is to reveal Yah's character ie. Lev. 19 it only reveals sin because not walking in it is sinful.

the Law is good, man's interpretation of the Law is bad.

I agree 100% and will take that a bit further and say the Torah is perfect (complete).

My most sincere prayer is that God will come down and show us how to live our lives pleasing to Him.

He already did that. 1 John 2:6
 
Yes it was. False testimony claiming they taught against the law of Moses is the reason Yeshua, Steven, Paul and many others were put to death. The ones who knew they weren't teaching against the Torah ie. Bereans are the ones who believed and followed. The ones who were deceived and thought Yeshua was anti Torah are the ones who rejected. Of course this doesn't describe everyone but the Bible is clear that these false teachings started immediately.

I think there is a step missing. They were trying to kill the Son of God and stoned Steven for blasphemy. And Paul, did get caught up in issues with the Law directly but most of the time it was about blasphemy which in the end was because of their interpretation of the Law. They were trying to use the Law against those who followed the Son of God, and they used their interpretation of the Law against them, but in reality they were arguing from a misunderstanding of what the Law was. So you can't really say they were using the Law correctly and make that a justification for what they did.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is a major oversimplification! The purpose of the Torah is to reveal Yah's character ie. Lev. 19 it only reveals sin because not walking in it is sinful.

If someone brings you a cake, do you enjoy it or do you ask about the ingredients first. Yes, the ingredients are very important, but you know that they had to be done right to make the cake delicious. I know the Law (Torah to Torah followers) is important but sometimes, I think, one can overemphasis the ingredients (Torah) and that takes away from enjoying the Cake (God).

He already did that. 1 John 2:6

Then I say Amen.
 
What are the commandments of God, the Law, the Torah? If God is so focused on us following them then He must of made it clear what they are.

And the answer, the Five books of Moses is not what I am looking for. There is a lot in those writings that are not Law but just words. If it's a Law then it most be something that can be lived by. If it can't be lived by it's just words. Is it the 613 rabbi's came up with?

Thy shalt not steal.
Thy shalt not commit adultery.
Thy shalt not ......
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One of the results of my study thru the Torah was an understanding of why a knowledgeable Torah Observing Jew would legitimately (according to Torah) reject Christ.

Among other reasons, How can one put his faith in and follow one who was cursed by God? Our acceptance of the Crucified Christ is a direct result of our approaching Torah after accepting that Christ is the Messiah. Judah primarily approaches it from the other direction. They don’t have the advantage of our Christianity bias. And they do have the stumbling block intentionally placed by God.

This was the Masoretics issue with Deuteronomy 21:23 . . .”for he that is hanged [on a tree] is accursed of God,
(Quoted in its entirety by Paul in Galatians 3:13)

This is part of the blessings and cursing of the Law. Its plain language. Can’t add to it, cant take it away.

Joshua 8:34 . . . And he (Joshua) read all the words of the law, the blessings and cursing, according to all that is written in the book of the law. There was not a word of all that Moses commanded, which Joshua read not before all the congregation of Israel.

I guarantee you, any knowledgeable Torah Observing Jew knows this curse. IMO this is far more likely the reason for the rejection of Christ in all the centuries rather than Christians in later centuries getting mixed up what Paul said.

One thing is certain, Paul preached Christ Crucified. Intentionally. And associated himself as being crucified with Christ, Intentionally. What we gloss over so easily, Judah to this day cant get past without a massive work of the Holy Spirit.
 
One of the results of my study thru the Torah was an understanding of why a knowledgeable Torah Observing Jew would legitimately (according to Torah) reject Christ.

Among other reasons, How can one put his faith in and follow one who was cursed by God? Our acceptance of the Crucified Christ is a direct result of our approaching Torah after accepting that Christ is the Messiah. Judah primarily approaches it from the other direction. They don’t have the advantage of our Christianity bias. And they do have the stumbling block intentionally placed by God.

This was the Masoretics issue with Deuteronomy 21:23 . . .”for he that is hanged [on a tree] is accursed of God,
(Quoted in its entirety by Paul in Galatians 3:13)

This is part of the blessings and cursing of the Law. Its plain language. Can’t add to it, cant take it away.

Joshua 8:34 . . . And he (Joshua) read all the words of the law, the blessings and cursing, according to all that is written in the book of the law. There was not a word of all that Moses commanded, which Joshua read not before all the congregation of Israel.

I guarantee you, any knowledgeable Torah Observing Jew knows this curse. IMO this is far more likely the reason for the rejection of Christ in all the centuries rather than Christians in later centuries getting mixed up what Paul said.

One thing is certain, Paul preached Christ Crucified. Intentionally. And associated himself as being crucified with Christ, Intentionally. What we gloss over so easily, Judah to this day cant get past without a massive work of the Holy Spirit.
But we mustn't forget that men like Paul, who was a Hebrew of the Hebrews, were all Jewish and were those whom God began building His church through. Before salvation, we were all in the same condition; dead in trespasses and sins (cf. Eph. 2:1-3) yet it is the very same gospel that calls both Jew and Gentile to life in Christ. So it's no more difficult for God to save one than the other.
 
How does this idea fit with:

Ezekiel 11:14-20 KJV
Again the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, [15] Son of man, thy brethren, even thy brethren, the men of thy kindred, and all the house of Israel wholly, are they unto whom the inhabitants of Jerusalem have said, Get you far from the LORD: unto us is this land given in possession. [16] Therefore say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; Although I have cast them far off among the heathen, and although I have scattered them among the countries, yet will I be to them as a little sanctuary in the countries where they shall come. [17] Therefore say, Thus saith the Lord GOD; I will even gather you from the people, and assemble you out of the countries where ye have been scattered, and I will give you the land of Israel. [18]
Gen. 49:10
The sceptre shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be.
[18] And they shall come thither, and they shall take away all the detestable things thereof and all the abominations thereof from thence. [19] And I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit within you; and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh: [20] That they may walk in my statutes, and keep mine ordinances, and do them: and they shall be my people, and I will be their God.

This sounds like the covenant that Yeshua is mediator of. Do you believe there will be a new or different spirit given in the future?

The new exodus is another matter. How does a literal physical regathering work with the verses that say "your descendants will inherit the nations" or that they would be sown in all the earth?

Many years after they were in Caanan the prophet Nathan told David among other things that "Moreover I will appoint a place for My people Israel, and will plant them, that they may dwell in a place of their own and move no more; nor shall the sons of wickedness oppress them anymore, as previously" (2Sa. 7:10)

Eze.37:14 And shall put my spirit in you, and ye shall live, and I shall place you in your own land: then shall ye know that I the Lord have spoken it, and performed it, saith the Lord.

Their possession of that land was conditional, and they did not repent. Yeshua stated the judgements saying they made the temple a den of robbers and then later standing over Jerusalem "Your house is left unto you desolate." (See Jer. 7)
I am sure there is plenty I don't understand. Just trying to....and don't want to throw anything out.
 
I think in all the prophecies, warnings and and literal designations one has to be very careful who Israel and Judah are, which Jerusalem is being talked about, and which land being identified. Mixing groups of people and their purpose makes things really difficult to say for sure something is what it is.

One thing we do know is that, eventually God brings them all together under His Son.
 
What does this mean? Is being Jewish better than being a Hebrew?
In his epistle to the Philippians, this is Paul's description of himself; circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a hebrew of the hebrews; concerning the law, a Pharisee (Phil. 3:5).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cap
One of the results of my study thru the Torah was an understanding of why a knowledgeable Torah Observing Jew would legitimately (according to Torah) reject Christ.

Among other reasons, How can one put his faith in and follow one who was cursed by God? Our acceptance of the Crucified Christ is a direct result of our approaching Torah after accepting that Christ is the Messiah. Judah primarily approaches it from the other direction. They don’t have the advantage of our Christianity bias. And they do have the stumbling block intentionally placed by God.

This was the Masoretics issue with Deuteronomy 21:23 . . .”for he that is hanged [on a tree] is accursed of God,
(Quoted in its entirety by Paul in Galatians 3:13)

This is part of the blessings and cursing of the Law. Its plain language. Can’t add to it, cant take it away.

Joshua 8:34 . . . And he (Joshua) read all the words of the law, the blessings and cursing, according to all that is written in the book of the law. There was not a word of all that Moses commanded, which Joshua read not before all the congregation of Israel.

I guarantee you, any knowledgeable Torah Observing Jew knows this curse. IMO this is far more likely the reason for the rejection of Christ in all the centuries rather than Christians in later centuries getting mixed up what Paul said.

One thing is certain, Paul preached Christ Crucified. Intentionally. And associated himself as being crucified with Christ, Intentionally. What we gloss over so easily, Judah to this day cant get past without a massive work of the Holy Spirit.

And this is exactly the reason why I find it difficult to want to go back to a, I don't want to say wrong, let's say, less informed way of seeing the path God had for Creation. Wanting to go back to a blind view seems illogical to me. The rabbinical way of thinking is flawed, how can it be trusted in other areas?
 
Seek to work together and leave the judging and fault finding to the husband.

Just like we are to keep our eyes and focus on the Messiah to KEEP us out of trouble, our wives MUST submit and obey the head that YaHWeH has placed over them.

Matthew 11:28-30 KJVA Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. (29) Take my yoke upon you, and learn of me; for I am meek and lowly in heart: and ye shall find rest unto your souls. (30) For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.

Ephesians 5:22-29 KJVA Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. (23) For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. (24) Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing. (25) Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; (26) That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, (27) That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish. (28) So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself. (29) For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church:
 
In his epistle to the Philippians, this is Paul's description of himself; circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a hebrew of the hebrews; concerning the law, a Pharisee (Phil. 3:5).

Do you think Paul was trying to establish his credentials so others would be convinced to a Jewish way of thinking or was he trying to say that he was all that and he still believed in the Messiah had come? That who he use to be didn't matter now that Christ opened his eyes?
 
Ten Parts In The King: The Prophesied Reconciliation of God's Two Witnesses https://www.amazon.com/dp/1729385672/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_Btq9DbCKG0ZF2

OK I feel like a goof ball right now. A lot has happened since the retreat. My wife is sitting here next to me and when I clicked on the link and she said we have that book, I think. Then it hits me like a ton of bricks, ohhh yeah we got that at the retreat. Then she gets it off the bookshelf. Sorry @PeteR we have a lot on our plate. But the book is in my hot little hands now.
 
Back
Top