I don't know that I'd call it the high ground, @steve(?) It's more like keeping themselves in the dark, shutting out any possible light of truth. But it's certainly another classic case of receiving the left boot of fellowship.And that, my friends, is what is known around here as receiving the left foot of fellowship.
It’s their only way of retaining the high ground when they can’t prove their position from scripture.
In their opinion they own the high ground.I don't know that I'd call it the high ground, @steve(?) It's more like keeping themselves in the dark, shutting out any possible light of truth. But it's certainly another classic case of receiving the left boot of fellowship.
Welcome to the fold @Off-Grid Artist.
We stand here ready to water that seed. My first thought is that he slandered you by referring to you as an evildoer. Servant of Messiah will difnitely get messages from your brothers and sisters over here. If they refuse to hear the truth from you, they certainly cannot ignore everyone!You’ve sown a seed.
That’s the most laughable part of all this. The verses used paint our brother as some out of control wretch. It’s his ideas they don’t like, not his actions. None of the sins mentioned are what they are getting rid of him for. It’s an insult to the injury.We stand here ready to water that seed. My first thought is that he slandered you by referring to you as an evildoer. Servant of Messiah will difnitely get messages from your brothers and sisters over here. If they refuse to hear the truth from you, they certainly cannot ignore everyone!
What is clearer to me by the day is that this issue divides those that are FOR marriage from those that FORBID marriage, and 1 Tim 4:1 tells us THEY are the ones in APOSTACY.It’s not a welcome viewpoint by 99% of supposedly Bible honoring congregations.

It is more like what all LOSERS in a debate do...It’s their only way of retaining the high ground when they can’t prove their position from scripture.
We are right and because we are right we are in a position of power. From that position, we can afford to have grace upon those that are ignorant. We do not need to attack the person or persons that hold erroneous beliefs, not their character, their intelligence, or anything else that is irrelevant to the point being advocated. Once we do that, we lose the high ground. Worse still, it has the effect of creating mental barriers in the eyes of those we are trying to win. Many times we succeed only in inoculating those we ridicule against the very position we want them to embrace.
Instead, listen for those attacks against you, and when you hear them celebrate. It means you won. They have run out of rational arguments, and now they turn to the lowest form of debate, the personal attack. Congratulations, you have undermined an erroneous position. It is time to wrap up. Take your victory and go home.
... but, but, but they didn't admit absolute crushing defeat...
And they are not going to. That happens much later between they, themselves, and God.
What is clearer to me by the day is that this issue divides those that are FOR marriage from those that FORBID marriage, and 1 Tim 4:1 tells us THEY are the ones in APOSTACY.
Jesus said if you put away a wife and marry another you commit "adultery" or break faith. Putting away isn't exactly divorce. Divorce does leave the woman able to remarry....except for the radicals who put their opinion above the word of YHWH that says "she is free to be another man's"During the phone call he very clearly defined himself as far more pro-divorce than pro-marriage. It was strange to hear it articulated.
That should have been a dead giveaway of where this was going to end up before you even got to this point.He is REALLY feminist. Whenever there is a dispute or conversation about a person's relationships or a couple's relationships, he automatically becomes embittered and jaded towards the man. It is always the man's fault.
I just want you to know that we feel your pain! Not just because you describe it but because we have all walked this out in many different ways. So, no surprises to anyone here on the reaction to your families defense of Biblical Families.Okay so I don't know when I'm just going to stop updating this thread but newsflash I guess.
...
Man, I really feel like a gossip on here. This is so much personal stuff I wouldn't bring up but right now I'm just swimming in all these people attacking us at the same time.
Sometimes the only people you can get through to, are those members who reach out to you and send you messages like this. Craft a polite response where you tell him that you are willing to sit down with him over lunch or a cup of coffee. Come armed with Scripture. It was said of Vince Bantu, that he could run circles around the other pastors; it was one of those pastors who said so. Unfortunately, he wants to pretend that he is not one of us, but he has been borrowing our arguments and thoroughly defeating the lame arguments of the godly men in his accountability group. For all we know Vince could be lurking here!I'm kinda burning a little warm over this right now. I've got a very good system of emotional sobriety and internal work, but it's still kind of new.
One of my friends in the church replied back to me. He literally used AI to craft his argument against me and I called him out on it. The intro and the outro were personalized but 80% was just AI and it was obvious. It wasn't even talking about the same topic we had been discussing, it was talking about how we need to love, and be faithful, and and and. Completely missed the mark of the topic.
I keep replaying the two-hour (?) phone call with my pastor the other day. He made a lot of Biblical misstatements. He said there were no plural marriages before the Flood, then he started listing off antediluvian names which included Lamech. He's never been able to keep straight his definition of adultery. He's banned his own adult kids from the church for "adulterous" relationships although I don't know what those are. His one daughter who is unbanned is back and seems happily married to a nice guy.
I want to make clear that he is very generous. He gives immeasurable amounts of his time to others to help them out, he has helped me with coding problems, lots of kind gestures for many people. He doesn't understand Biblical marriage and divorce the way I do now though, my knowledge of which largely has to do with being a lurker on this site for so long.
Another thing I want to give him props for is that last year he tried really hard to create a patriarchal-style courtship for one of his daughters. She had found a man online who was back east and trying to build a church, and he wanted her to come join him and marry him. So my pastor inserted himself into the conversation and became the go-between for them both. He drove down there to spend a few days with the guy's parents. He flew the kid up to stay with a neighbor so the two could court under his watch. Admirable attempt, but it went very poorly unfortunately. The young man wasn't respecting him and the whole visit was icy, my pastor was inflamed and on edge, and his daughter (I think) didn't have a patriarchal respect enough for her father to understand what he was doing or the value of it. Feminist household. Soon after, the pastor was temporarily distracted by a family emergency and the daughter took all three of her kids and fled the state, heading east to supposedly be married immediately. Sadly that turned into drama and the kid was not sincere about the marriage proposal, but hey! They got an apartment. She made a mistake, it is sad.
Just remembered why I quoted Joleneakamama above:
He is REALLY feminist. Whenever there is a dispute or conversation about a person's relationships or a couple's relationships, he automatically becomes embittered and jaded towards the man. It is always the man's fault. We have some family friends with young women who are having a hard time finding a husband, and instead of being encouraged if they might find one he stays in this mindset of "is their father successful at keeping all the young men entirely away from them?"
During the phone call he very clearly defined himself as far more pro-divorce than pro-marriage. It was strange to hear it articulated. I told him that I don't believe God wants us to be divorcing at all, and that there are almost no reasons given for divorcing, and Yeshua told us that His standards for acceptable divorce were higher than the guidelines we had been given to manage our failure rate. He literally told me that there are a lot of very good reasons to divorce and that it should be an automatic outcome to many decisions a spouse might make. I was like, no man, now that I understand how Biblical marriages are supposed to work, almost every marriage failure I can see or hear about shouldn't have happened. It's all based on domination of the male through fear, shame, guilt and control. This inverts the godly hierarchy and destroys the family.
Or shake the dust of that apostate, marriage forbidding church off!Win over every member of your congregation as God lays out those opportunities for you.
That would work pretty well, if you are also capable of performing some of the signs and wonders that the disciples were given authority to perform when Jesus sent them out.Or shake the dust of that apostate, marriage forbidding church off!
"Let the dead bury their dead" and find fellowship with people that are not suffering STRONG DELUSION because they rejected the truth!
We do NOT need signs and wonders to give validity to the written word. They had that to validate Yeshua/Jesus as the Messiah.That would work pretty well, if you are also capable of performing some of the signs and wonders that the disciples were given authority to perform when Jesus sent them out.
It sure wouldn't hurt! Of course our brothers and sisters in Christ already hold to a belief in Yeshua/Jesus as the Messiah. I don't think shaking the dust off our feet, is the way to go, when we are not healing the sick, casting out demons, and preaching in their synagogues.We do NOT need signs and wonders to give validity to the written word. They had that to validate Yeshua/Jesus as the Messiah.
Really? Like Mark C points out. They dont believe in the one who is the same yesterday, today and forever, who said he came NOT to destroy the law. They have not accepted a spirit or thirst for truth, but rather a spirit of RELIGIOUS SUPERIORITY, and an apostate one at that.Of course our brothers and sisters in Christ already hold to a belief in Yeshua/Jesus as the Messiah
@Off-Grid Artist, take a breath, sit down and read the final chapters of each of the gospels. Jesus was perfect in His life, yet look how He was treated by the religious people of His day.None of this is making sense to me.
Having a biblical framework for your daily living is going to have you living a life often in conflict with the majority. Take courage brother, others have walked this same path and survived. Shalom.I've got pretty thick skin but it's getting me down and it still doesn't really make any sense to me.