Avoid pork!

[Mark C]

Can you link your sources? I'd like to look into it.
Other than the book, I don't have time to read a book at the moment.

You don't actually have to read the book(s) to see the point.

RFK's exposition has over 400 pages of copiously-documented evidence, and well over 1000 footnotes. Just read the table of contents. From his HIV background, and the connections to the proteins that were grafted onto later bioweaponry, to the setup, to the propaganda, to the lies, pick a chapter and just read that. Or go through the volumes of articles, pick a title. There is NO shortage of documentation, readily verifiable.

Likewise, Dr. Kory's story about the (very literal) War on Ivermectin is that of a self-described very-left physician who was "red-pilled" the hard way, by watching people die. And being persecuted for trying to honor his oath as a healer. Much of his testimony is first-hand, but here, I can personally confirm the factual basis; the war on ivermectin was intended to ensure that NO options to the Poison Poke were allowed. Period. And death was the result.

I knew some of that story, and was angry before I read it, for the obvious reason. But, seeing his evidence, I firmly believe that Fauci is deserving of a fair trial. And then execution for genocide.

 

[theleastofthese]

Thank you. I'll take a look at both when I get time. I'm curious.

 

[MeganC]

Likewise, Dr. Kory's story about the (very literal) War on Ivermectin is that of a self-described very-left physician who was "red-pilled" the hard way, by watching people die. And being persecuted for trying to honor his oath as a healer. Much of his testimony is first-hand, but here, I can personally confirm the factual basis; the war on ivermectin was intended to ensure that NO options to the Poison Poke were allowed. Period. And death was the result.

In May of 2022 we had Covid in the house and we treated it with hydroxychloroquine and it ended in about three days.

An FYI is that some of the people who took Ivermectin for their Covid ended up curing their various cancers.

I am cautious of the above information as there are serious side effects happening with people who overuse Ivermectin. But if anyone else in this family comes down with a cancer we will absolutely go there if we need to.

 

[MemeFan]

I am cautious of the above information as there are serious side effects happening with people who overuse Ivermectin. But if anyone else in this family comes down with a cancer we will absolutely go there if we need to.

Btw, Ivermectin is used now for several decades.

Risk factors should be well known by now.

 

[MeganC]

Btw, Ivermectin is used now for several decades.

Risk factors should be well known by now.

Yes, but the risks you mention are known to professionals. The amateurs who are using drugs based on videos or sketchy articles are taking needless risks. I'm saying that before I would use Ivermectin to treat a cancer I'd want to do a lot more research than to just follow what some guy says on TikTok or something like that.

 

[Mark C]

I am cautious of the above information as there are serious side effects happening with people who overuse Ivermectin. But if anyone else in this family comes down with a cancer we will absolutely go there if we need to.

Interesting. Can you cite sources? (and details on time and amounts, if you know)

 

[MeganC]

Interesting. Can you cite sources? (and details on time and amounts, if you know)

First, "legit" sources that say Ivermectin is useful in cancer treatment:

https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article/82/12_Supplement/2320/701043/Abstract-2320-Ivermectin-suppresses-pancreatic

Ivermectin suppresses tumour growth and metastasis through degradation of PAK1 in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma - PMC

Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), the most common form of oesophageal malignancies in the Asia‐Pacific region, remains a major clinical challenge. In this study, we found that ivermectin, an effective antiparasitic drug that has been ...

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

And then...

Ivermectin - LiverTox - NCBI Bookshelf

Ivermectin is an antiinfective agent with activity against several parasitic nematodes and scabies and is the treatment of choice for onchocerciasis (river blindness). It is typically given as one or two oral doses. Ivermectin therapy has been associated with minor, self-limiting serum...

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Ivermectin therapy has been associated with minor, self-limiting serum aminotransferase elevations and very rare instances of clinically apparent liver injury.

My caution is to determine correct dosage before jumping in to using it.

 

[Mark C]

Thanks, I'm very familiar NOW (after not being able to find the information early under Fauci-stein) with Ivermectin. Dr. Pierre Kory, and The War on Ivermectin, is an excellent source.

But I don't recall any serious side-effects. Articles I saw from him, and ICCC, etc (the persecuted actual doctors) all said that overdose was highly tolerated; indeed, they later doubled their schedule recommendations for that reason.

The number that all I know use (and I'm in contact with his team) say anyone can use 24 mg per 200 pounds of body weight. Thus, two 12 mg tablets for a typical large man.***

I was also taking it prophylacticly, whenever I'd go out in public, given the number of vaxxed shedders out there.

But they recommend ANYBODY with 'long-covid' symptoms (and they treat post-vaxx syndrome similarly) to take a dose per day, in general, and for extended periods.

PS> (And this was shocking to me) Dr. Brian Ardiss has also published work about treatments using Nicotine patches that show great effectiveness against "brain fog," and other long-covid, ie, shedding due to vaxx, syndromes. They work by binding to ACE4 receptors, and he says, are NOT addictive.


-------------------------------------
*** Standard disclaimer: This is not 'medical advice' or anything similar. Just what I've been told, and my personal understanding. Big Bro is watching...

 

[Mark C]

In the above context of actual caution, I was reminded of this:

Because I'm still waiting for the "actual scientific" warnings. Calm down...

If Fauci and the FDA and CDC and other TLA's say their EUA is "safe and effective," but even CORRELATIONS (which we are told, "do not prove causality") still show a six-sigma (VERY statistically-significant) increase in "all-cause mortality" and tens of thousand who have taken it, including those not at risk for COVID anyway, DROP DEAD "suddenly", would you "err on the side of caution"?

Even if the pushers don't decide to warn?

And then what if you find that "scientific journals" (HA - NEJM and the Lancet, et al) WON'T/didn't/censored publish those warning papers?

We have a different definition of the word "scientific," it seems.

But it's people's understanding to the concept of statistical risk that resulted in books about the Black Swan events, etc.

@theleastofthese -- You can still find caring physicians of the likes of Dr. Pierre Kory (book above) who are clinically treating people who were duped into taking the vaxx, and particularly the boosters. It may save your life.

 

[Patricia C]

PRION-CONTAMINATED PORK ALERT: All across the United States, pigs can be “vaccinated” with millions of deadly prions via mRNA clot shots – UNLABELED – NaturalNews.com

Pork producers in America have been administering mRNA-based gene therapy to pigs secretly, contaminating pork with self-assembling nanoparticles. Harrisvaccines pioneered RNA-based livestock vaccines, acquired by Merck Animal Health in 2016, leading to the prevalence of unregulated gene therapy...

www.naturalnews.com

Thanks for the information.