I don't believe you. For you, HPT is part of your faith and probably identity. This is why you so sticky with HPT. I doubt are even able to try to become more objective toward HPT because any issues with HPT will cause identity/faith crisis with you.
So if HPT were wrong, I wouldn't know what to believe as far as the veracity of Scripture, but I can say that there are a LOT of physical evidences that do in fact work out with the HPT, and there are some things, I still haven't quite worked out.
Here is test. Provide at least one issue/evidence against HPT. No theory is perfect, so there must be some anomalies.
I have often wondered why if there was a ridge under the Rocky Mountains, why the two ridges wouldn't balance each other out, and prevent the plates from sliding in either direction, but I suppose that could have been a timing issue, where the pacific buckling upward action did not transpire until after the plates had started sliding. A;so, when I look at the Mid oceanic ridge, it does seem to vanish North of Scandinavia. I have a few other head scratchers, I will post when I can recall what they are. You must have missed the post where I stated quite clearly that I hadn't quite worked out everything in HPT.
No, we can't agree that time moves forward. Maybe time goes backwards in special cases, however brain's intepretation is always time going forward.
In the physical realm, no. In the Spiritual realm, of course it does. That is how John was able to see his revelation of what is to take place. We cannot explain the spiritual realm. Should God grnt you the ability to see the future, and you have this gift of prophecy, we will listen to what you have to say, but we will also hold anyone who does prophecy, to account for their prophecies, in order to test the spirits. II Peter tells us how prohpets were moved by the Ruach, but then he goes on to warn that there were also false prophets.
You are entered into epistemiology.
NOBODY SEES REALITY AS IT IS BECAUSE WE ARE LIMITED BY OUR SENSES THEMSELVES AND SENSE-MAKING BRAIN/MIND PROCESSES.
Well according to that defintion of reality, I don't see where we disagree, IF and ONLY IF, you understand that the spiritual realm is not something we ought to be manipulating. Scripture warns us quite often about evil spirits. They are more than willing to grant you whatever your heart desires, but it comes at a price. I recommend some Chris White Youtube videos, and also some of the GoodFightMinistries videos as well.
You don't see moving object where it is. You see prediction of where brain thinks moving object will be. Why? Because info of moving objects doesn't show automatically and immediately in mind. Info must travel by light, then by nerves and into info-processing part of brain which means that info-processing part receives past, not now.
So again, you are describing the physical realm. This realm obeys Newton's laws. Divine beings and evil spirits certainly have the ability to manipulate this.
Therefore before mind becomes aware, brain must make prediction where object is now before making any decision what to do with object.
Imagine playing ping pong without ball's location prediction. You will always miss ball.
You can't prove it's impossible because as per Karl Popper we can't prove any scientific theory. We can only prove they are false.
I proved that either a time machine will never be invented, or Megan doesn't really believe that it will be invented as much as she claims to believe it, since there has not been a post in the past few days, forecasting the stock market for the next three weeks. I threw down the gauntlet for her, and either she has not been recording the stock market for herself or her posterity, to come here and give us this wonderful insight, or there will never be a time machine invented, that will be available for any of her descendants to come, to take them back to our time, and give us this uncannily predicatble insight.
I saw what my whole class didn't. I just didn't do full math correctly.
LOLOL ROTFL!!!!!
See my Karl Popper comment.
Well it seems to me that one of two possibilities has been proven, and Megan is free to shed some light on which one it is.
So your contribution is zero evidence backing your claims. Which means you don't have them?
Enlighten yourself. Watch Mr. Flemings video that I just posted.
Also again epistemiology. Brain can perceive time as same for everybody which means we may not see time going backwards naturally. To notice time going backwards would require physics theory allowing time being negative and very devious experiment with only one reasonable explanation.
You know if you get in a dark room with a bunch of candles with a medium, she just may be able to conjure up spirits of the dead for you. Then again, you may find yourself dealing with sleep paralysis as a result of messing around with occultic practices. Newton's theories have served us just fine. Neo-Newtonian theories such as Stochastic Electrodynamics, are bulding upon that. Einstein set the entire science community backwards. Nikota Tesla recognized that Einstein was a crock.
Again, just before 20th man couldn't fly, doesn't mean man's flying is impossible, only that then current knowledge and methods were inadequate for flight. Or motivation was missing in people.
Well they DID have hot air balloons. Look! If you want to believe in science fiction, go ahead and believe that to your hearts content, but this is a Cum Hoc fallacy. I have laid out a number of science fiction concepts that will always remain science fiction. The time machine is one of them. The transporter is another, as is the minaturizer. I will look it up to see which thread I posted that in.
What ether has with relativity?
It shows that there is a plausible alternative to reltivity. Go back and watch the videos I posted on Einstein's lies. It should be on the first couple of pages in this thread.
Einstein's theories deal with macro scale, not nano and below. If prediction on macro scale are correct then theory is useful.
But the mechanism is wrong. If we can get the same predictions on a theory that does not violate what we know to be true on the quantum level, we can discard relativity.
And even if one prediction is wrong, it doesn't mean rest is garbage.
And you want to call me out for being a true believer in HPT!
Even if our understanding is wrong why heat and temperature exist, doesn't mean that all knowledge involving heat and temperature is wrong.
I am not sure what that has to do with relativity.
Paragraf proving you see our "questioning of your scientific paradigm" as personal "attack on your faith". You have tendecy not to provide scientific proof, but to speak about your faith.
And I readily admitted that I can be a doubting Thomas at times.
Also see my comment about before 20th century flight for time manipulation.
That is the same tired Cum Hoc fallacy argument that Megan has been spouting!
Incorrect usage. Just because A happened before B, doesn't mean A is cause of B. However, causality requires A happening before B which implies such fallacies are only cautions in thinking.
No it isn't! Who is trying to prove what? She was using that article as evidence for time dilation. Fleming has a better explanation here. The clocks are experiencing the interaction with the ZPE AKA the aether, and that is supposed to prove that time itself moved at a different rate????? Give me a break!
Also, zero useful info why experiment with clock is wrong. Claiming fallacy isn't scientific proof.
I was not trying to prove anything!
For everything I don't like, I claim fallacy (or farce) seems your modus operandi.
Yes! I don't like when people invoke Logical Fallacies, because Logical Fallacies are used for the sole purpose of deceiving others! Pointing out which Logical Fallacy has been employed, is much simpler than trying to explain why their so-called "proof" is invalid.
Lord doing something isn't scientific proof.
OK, well the Bible says that He did do it. Seven times it says that God stretched out the heavens. Redshift is the result! I am not claiming that God saying that He did it, is proof. The Redshift is the evidence. We can trust the Word of God. I will find a video of Barry Setterfield for you, where he explains this.
Science deals with natural causes, in another word something caused by events, materials etc... in nature itself. It has zero with Lord's activities.
Events such as the heavens being stretched out. Are you trying to claim that God didn't do, what His Word clearly says that He did, and that we can see evidence that it has occurred?
Maybe Tesla was one wrong here. After all, experiments prove Tesla wrong here.
Ugh! Which experiments have proven him wrong?
Btw, how it's possible to create totally bonkers theory as per Tesla which still provides good predictions?
Which theory are you referring to?
They matter. If mathemathics allows negative time, then physists have to prove going backwards is impossible.
Well, are you up for the Biff challenge? Go ahead and keep a record of the top five perfoming stocks over the next three weeks, and make sure that this record is handed down to someone who will in the future, go back in time to the present, and make sure that we all can see what it will be. I am calling your bluff, just like I did with Megan. If someone comes on here Apr 28th through Apr 30th, and posts this valuable insight, I will acknowledge, provided that information turns out to be accurate, that one day a time machine will be built. If that does not happen, are you willing to acknowledge that this will never happen? Put up or shut up!
www.scientificamerican.com
