Have you ever noticed how unbelievers go out of their way not to investigate facts?
For instance one person is very insistent that Jesus never died on a cross, (because of the Quran written hundreds of years later by people who were not eyewitnesses) but whenever I point out historical evidence she starts saying the new testament is full of contradictions or changes the subject. It seems like she knows that if she were to investigate the facts she would have to admit Jesus was executed so she wants to hide from the truth. By the way I am not hassling her because she initiated the conversation about Christianity and why she thinks certain Christian beliefs do not make sense, and she was very talkative about Christianity until confronted with evidence. And she never said I was rude, she just tries to dodge the subject, which in a sense she brought up herself by asking questions about Christianity.
Even if the new testament if full of contradictions there is evidence outside the new testament that Jesus was executed. It could be the case that Jesus was executed but the new testament is not 100% true, so what she is saying does not make any sense at all, if you are academically honest. (By the way I am not saying that the new testament is not 100% true.)
Why do people cling to belief systems even when historical evidence against their belief system clearly outweighs evidence for it?
For instance one person is very insistent that Jesus never died on a cross, (because of the Quran written hundreds of years later by people who were not eyewitnesses) but whenever I point out historical evidence she starts saying the new testament is full of contradictions or changes the subject. It seems like she knows that if she were to investigate the facts she would have to admit Jesus was executed so she wants to hide from the truth. By the way I am not hassling her because she initiated the conversation about Christianity and why she thinks certain Christian beliefs do not make sense, and she was very talkative about Christianity until confronted with evidence. And she never said I was rude, she just tries to dodge the subject, which in a sense she brought up herself by asking questions about Christianity.
Even if the new testament if full of contradictions there is evidence outside the new testament that Jesus was executed. It could be the case that Jesus was executed but the new testament is not 100% true, so what she is saying does not make any sense at all, if you are academically honest. (By the way I am not saying that the new testament is not 100% true.)
Why do people cling to belief systems even when historical evidence against their belief system clearly outweighs evidence for it?