ב"ה
As full bible readers we see this as incongruent with the rest of scripture. This may have been a temporary restriction for a special circumstance Paul was handling at that time in that place.
Be that as it may, I would like to do due diligence and research what the heck this word really means.
We've already seen in another thread that "deacon" may very well have meant a pastoral aide, secretary, etc. a quite low level office like a servant or attache to a higher level minister; not really what deacon means in the English language.
In this thread, I would like it if everyone can pitch in with their knowledge and resources to try to flesh out exactly what this word "episkopos" may have really meant. Let's abandon historical churchy baggage and get at the heart of this. Part of the difficulty with this word is in the fact that in Ancient Greek (pre-biblical) it is never used in a religious sense.
The translators of the Septuagint (Jewish Greek translation of the Old Testament often quoted directly in the Greek New Testament) co-opted the word to function in many ways.
The predominant use in the Old Testament is to translate the word פקד (to visit [for good or bad]) and it's derivatives פָּקִיד (overseer,representative) and פְּקֻדָּה (commission, appointment, office, a watch, sentry, vengeance, punishment, administration).
The Greek word maps 1 time to נגשׂ (to oppress; slave driver) in Isaiah 60:17
In the New Testament the word is used only 5 times (though verbal forms occur as well).
1 Tim 3:2
Titus 1:7
1 Pe 2:25
Php 1:1
Act 20:28
I'm still researching as time permits, but today I came across an interesting bit from the English translation of the great Germany scholarly work, "Theological Dictionary of the New Testament".
Partial entry follows (references are mostly to Talmudic tractates) emphasis mine:
The Rabbis added nothing to the development of the thought of divine visitation. On the other hand, visitation, esp. of the sick, is important in Rabb. ethics. It is one of the works of love which it is the religious duty of every Jew to perform. The visitation of the sick, the sheltering of strangers, the helping of the newly married poor, the comforting of the sorrowing and attendance at funerals are all cultic duties acc. to one Rabbinic opinion (Shab., 127a). Clothing the naked, visiting the sick, comforting the sorrowing and burying the dead are mentioned in Sota, 14a. But visitation of the sick comes first: “Be not negligent to visit the sick, for by such conduct thou wilt reap love,” we read already in Sir. 7:35 (36). R. Aqiba is more severe: “If any will not visit the sick, it is as though he shed blood,” Ned., 40a. “Whoso visits a sick man, lifts a sixtieth part of his burden,” Ned., 39b. The point of this visitation is not merely to show sympathy or to convey wishes for recovery, but above all to pray for the sick man.
Beyer, H. W. (1964–). ἐπισκέπτομαι, ἐπισκοπέω, ἐπισκοπή, ἐπίσκοπος, ἀλλοτριεπίσκοπος. G. Kittel, G. W. Bromiley, & G. Friedrich (Eds.), Theological dictionary of the New Testament (English ed., Vol. 2, p. 603). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Why do I think this Rabbinical Jewish aspect is important?
Paul is heavily influenced by Rabbinical perspectives and most of the baraitas (oral sayings of famed teachers) referenced in the Talmudic portions here would have been known to him. Paul also has the audacity to say "I *am* a Pharisee..." so this seems to demonstrate his continued affinity for this mode of learning. A useful process in getting at biblical truth when there are centuries of church cultural tradition is to time travel back and tear it all down and imagine what this would look like to someone in the 1st century.
I think there may be something to this Rabbinical perspective of the this word.
Visitor of the sick and visitor of others in desperate situations. In so doing "Bishops" are embassadors of the L-rd in a very real sense; perhaps trusted with resources of the congregation for this purpose. I can think of many reasons why it would not be fitting in those days to send a man whom 25 souls depended on for livelihood to someone sick with the plague. I'm just stretching my arms here so any input is welcome.
Let's dig deeper together and see where this takes us. I want to find the truth, whether it is comfortable to us or not.
I have a couple other strands of thought but want to take this in bite size chunks, floating it on the Biblical Families "brain trust".
Last edited: