"What do you think of euthanasia?" "They are probably about the same as youth in Europe or youth in America."
-
Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.
What dictionary are you using...?
- Thread starter MarvelousMarvin
- Start date
Euthanasia means good death and is often used to make a bad death sound good. But not all deaths are bad, in the sense that the death of Hitler was Euthanasia on account of he could not use his time alive to cause anymore bad deaths, although tragic in the sense, that maybe he would have had a change of heart if he lived longer.
There are plenty of examples of Euthanasia, it is just that bad deaths are usually incorrectly classified as Euthanasia.
There are plenty of examples of Euthanasia, it is just that bad deaths are usually incorrectly classified as Euthanasia.
dtt: You missed the point, which was simply a (hopefully funny) play on words...
...but you are correct in what you said.
Maybe another way to define murder would be this: post-natal abortion. Wonder if a defense based on that concept would work in our twisted court system, since abortion is legal under most circumstances?
Moving on to another twisted-by-the-court-system subject: a few years ago, some professor in Florida claimed that there are several sexual orientations that were unrecognized until he identified them. The two I remember (it's been a few years since I read about this) were "male lesbian" and "female gay." A "male lesbian" is a "woman trapped in a man's body," but that "trapped woman" is a lesbian; likewise, a "female gay" is a "man trapped in a woman's body," but the "trapped man" is gay. A male lesbian would be attracted to anyone "trapped" in a female body, and a female gay, to anyone "trapped" in a male body. ("Oh, what a tangled web we weave...")
Maybe we should attack anti-PM legislation by somehow using those definitions - claim that those in a plural marriage are actually a male lesbian (the hubby) and a bunch of female gays (the wives.) Because homosexuals have more rights in our twisted court system (and in society at large) than any other group in America, especially more than we born-again believers, we might get somewhere...
NOT! Let's keep our arguments Bible-based.
...but you are correct in what you said.
Maybe another way to define murder would be this: post-natal abortion. Wonder if a defense based on that concept would work in our twisted court system, since abortion is legal under most circumstances?
Moving on to another twisted-by-the-court-system subject: a few years ago, some professor in Florida claimed that there are several sexual orientations that were unrecognized until he identified them. The two I remember (it's been a few years since I read about this) were "male lesbian" and "female gay." A "male lesbian" is a "woman trapped in a man's body," but that "trapped woman" is a lesbian; likewise, a "female gay" is a "man trapped in a woman's body," but the "trapped man" is gay. A male lesbian would be attracted to anyone "trapped" in a female body, and a female gay, to anyone "trapped" in a male body. ("Oh, what a tangled web we weave...")
Maybe we should attack anti-PM legislation by somehow using those definitions - claim that those in a plural marriage are actually a male lesbian (the hubby) and a bunch of female gays (the wives.) Because homosexuals have more rights in our twisted court system (and in society at large) than any other group in America, especially more than we born-again believers, we might get somewhere...
NOT! Let's keep our arguments Bible-based.