On Wednesday the US Congress held serious hearings to discuss UAP/UFO reports and the growing evidence that the government has suppressed information about these things. A fairly neutral news story is found here:
One of the people testifying spoke to the psychological operation of ridiculing and mocking anyone reporting or investigating these phenomena.
Case in point is the reporting from Forbes and their disclaimer about their reporter:
www.forbes.com
The tone of the hearing itself was dead serious and the people testifying spoke to receiving threats of imprisonment, retaliation, or death if they revealed certain material facts to anyone including Congress.
What has stood out to me is the change in tone of multiple news media and politicians on this topic.
In the past anytime the media would report on UAP/UFO topics the reporters would yuk it up, laugh, and make a general mockery of whatever they were reporting.
Not many reporters are doing this when reporting these hearings.
This is a significant change in posture for this topic and I believe it is because we are being groomed or prepared for either a significant announcement or perhaps a series of significant announcements.
On an aside I watched the hearing on You Tube and subsequently noticed that You Tube was recommending videos to me on such scintillating topics as:
The archaeology THEY don't want you to see!, The world map THEY don't want you to see! , and then a series of paranoid conspiracy theories on all manner of subjects from the JFK assassination to aliens living inside of a hollow earth.
I had to go back and remove the UAP/UFO hearing videos from my watch history so the You Tube algorithm would stop sending crap to my feed.
The point being that You Tube's algorithm has a built in bias that anyone viewing a UAP/UFO topic is a fringe paranoiac. Hopefully this will change.
In any case, I find the change in the media posture toward this subject to be a significant development.
One of the people testifying spoke to the psychological operation of ridiculing and mocking anyone reporting or investigating these phenomena.
Case in point is the reporting from Forbes and their disclaimer about their reporter:
Congressional UFO Hearing Features Eye-Opening UAP Claims
The hearing aimed to "pull back the curtain on secret UAP research programs conducted by the U.S. government," but it was short on hard evidence.
www.forbes.com
The tone of the hearing itself was dead serious and the people testifying spoke to receiving threats of imprisonment, retaliation, or death if they revealed certain material facts to anyone including Congress.
What has stood out to me is the change in tone of multiple news media and politicians on this topic.
In the past anytime the media would report on UAP/UFO topics the reporters would yuk it up, laugh, and make a general mockery of whatever they were reporting.
Not many reporters are doing this when reporting these hearings.
This is a significant change in posture for this topic and I believe it is because we are being groomed or prepared for either a significant announcement or perhaps a series of significant announcements.
On an aside I watched the hearing on You Tube and subsequently noticed that You Tube was recommending videos to me on such scintillating topics as:
The archaeology THEY don't want you to see!, The world map THEY don't want you to see! , and then a series of paranoid conspiracy theories on all manner of subjects from the JFK assassination to aliens living inside of a hollow earth.
I had to go back and remove the UAP/UFO hearing videos from my watch history so the You Tube algorithm would stop sending crap to my feed.
The point being that You Tube's algorithm has a built in bias that anyone viewing a UAP/UFO topic is a fringe paranoiac. Hopefully this will change.
In any case, I find the change in the media posture toward this subject to be a significant development.
