The Economics of Divorce

[Mojo]

A pretty short read, with thoughts that could potentially be applied to polygyny. The author identifies the economic and even life span detriment to all involved in divorce, mainly due to division of resources. . It would be fascinating if someone could ever perform an analysis on the economic implications of additional resources and economic benefits (polygyny).

As the OP, I’m requesting only comments from those who’ve read this article.

Link


“It comes as no surprise that divorce is harmful for children. Most would likely highlight the emotional strain imposed on children from the loss of normal relations between parents, but harmful effects can be economic. Dividing the family into two households means lower incomes and financially costly negotiations, which could impact children over the long term.”

 

[Man_in_the_Middle]

Within this article, it stated the following:

These results shouldn’t be surprising. Parenting is a long-term, team project. Early in childhood, parents make plans and establish routines. These plans and routines lay the foundation for the rest of the child’s life. Like any joint project, whether in family, business, or politics, plans are made because the planning process adds value. Scrapping plans is akin to removing an essential part of the foundation.

This highlights the very thing that I encourage men to do all the time. That is, set out to purposefully establish your household. This includes everything from how you want conversation to happen to how you want guests greeted and treated to what individual's talents are going to be funded and encouraged to how people should keep their hygiene etc....

If we do not set about to establish it, it will establish itself. The truth is, a lot of that will sort out as it should naturally but when we observe that it is not shaking out as it should, we need to be purposeful in making changes for the better.

As the article states, these plans and routines are the foundation of our children's futures...

This is not a polygny statement, it is a leadership statement.