A few days ago Congress passed the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act, or "FOSTA", which (assuming Trump signs it) makes website owners liable for sex trafficking that is facilitated through their website, whether they have any involvement in or even awareness of such conduct. Craigslist has already taken down their personals sections, and 4thefamily.us has taken down their whole site indefinitely.
Biblical Families has no 'personal ads' section and actively discourages any kind of online matchmaking or dating, let alone hookups. There should not be an exposure here for us; however, (a) we'll need to review this and see what exposure we would have if any due to the private messaging facility (which virtually every online discussion forum has, so if it applies to us, it should apply to any online forum), and (b) we never know what the end game of our overlords is, so any legal maneuvering that increases the ability of our rulers to persecute minorities and subcultures through the use of plants or patsies has to be taken seriously.
Nathan and Ron and I will have to look at this together and monitor the situation as it evolves. Maybe Trump won't sign it (maybe I'll win the lottery…). The DOJ was opposed to it, so enforcement resources will be an issues, and we're just not their target. Craigslist's legendary personals ads, I get; our online discussion of what the bible teaches about marriage and family, not so much.
Further bulletins as events warrant. If y'all have any info or come across any interesting commentary that could help us evaluate this latest attack on the Constitution, please post it here.
Light bedtime reading: How Congress Censored the Internet
Biblical Families has no 'personal ads' section and actively discourages any kind of online matchmaking or dating, let alone hookups. There should not be an exposure here for us; however, (a) we'll need to review this and see what exposure we would have if any due to the private messaging facility (which virtually every online discussion forum has, so if it applies to us, it should apply to any online forum), and (b) we never know what the end game of our overlords is, so any legal maneuvering that increases the ability of our rulers to persecute minorities and subcultures through the use of plants or patsies has to be taken seriously.
Nathan and Ron and I will have to look at this together and monitor the situation as it evolves. Maybe Trump won't sign it (maybe I'll win the lottery…). The DOJ was opposed to it, so enforcement resources will be an issues, and we're just not their target. Craigslist's legendary personals ads, I get; our online discussion of what the bible teaches about marriage and family, not so much.
Further bulletins as events warrant. If y'all have any info or come across any interesting commentary that could help us evaluate this latest attack on the Constitution, please post it here.
Light bedtime reading: How Congress Censored the Internet