• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

No mark is still a mark.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anonymous
  • Start date Start date
A

Anonymous

Guest
This is going to sound a little kooky, but here goes the kook. I was thinking about a time a few years ago when I bought quite a few head of cattle. I told the person who owned the cattle I was buying from, that I would pick out the cattle I would buy and mark them. The mark would signify my ownership, and the ones without a mark would show the cattle still owned buy the person I was buying my cattle from. This memory got me thinking. The question is, does the lack of a physical mark still a mark? This question has led to another question. Is the Mark of the beast the only mark? It got me searching the scripture for verses on the mark. I was shocked to find the following verses. Ezekiel 9. It says in verse 4 and 5 "4:And the LORD said unto him, Go through the midst of the city, through the midst of Jerusalem, and set a mark upon the foreheads of the men that sigh and that cry for all the abominations that be done in the midst thereof.5:And to the others he said in mine hearing, Go ye after him through the city, and smite: let not your eye spare, neither have ye pity: "

The main question I have. Is everyone one going to be marked? Whos mark of ownership do you have? I think the lack of a physical mark is still a mark and it shows to whom you CHOOSE to belong to and serve. As for me and my house we will serve the Lord.

Robert
 
Thats right, to be unmarked is to be marked when everyone else is marked. Even being someone without a tatoo makes you different now that they are commonplace.
 
Back
Top