• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Lions and tigers and....wolves? Oh My!

Joleneakamama

Seasoned Member
Real Person
Female
This is a less common view and perhaps should be labeled meat?
It has a carnivores title....I will let a moderator decide. :p

I have been pondering a bit on the comments shared in the thread “Hashing out the First Two Wives” but did not want to derail that thread.

The general idea being shared is that we need to learn how to become one (echad/united) with the other bride (the brides being Judah and Israel) and it is suggested that this is what YHWH purposes to do and wants to see happen. Where we see things differently then most is not related to whether or not the above statement is true, but in understanding the timeline for that fulfillment.

While most seem to be looking ahead and expecting Jews and Christians to come together, and many evangelicals are working actively toward that goal, I would like to present a perspective from scripture that suggests a different timeline, one that saw that prophesy fulfilled 2000 years ago. It is always good to consider things from another angle or side. Please if you share a different understanding, support it from scripture and history. I am happy to provide references for any aspect.

I believe most of the animosity between the two modern “brides” stems not from the original conflict between the House of Israel and House of Judah, but from a case of mistaken identity and different natures of the two modern groups. History relates that two groups of cousins that YHWH said were” two manners of people” got intermixed before the time of Christ. These two groups were the children of Israel (Jacob’s posterity) and the children of Esau/Edom, also called Edomites and Idumea. The Jewish encyclopedia tells about Herod the Great, and if he is any example of Edomite nature and values it becomes apparent that their nature is more in harmony with the values of Babylon then the kingdom of heaven.

Yeshua/Jesus warned of wolves in sheep’s clothing. I believe He was referring to those Jews that were not Israelite and had retained the hunter nature inherited from Esau. Jesus told some to their face that “My word has no place in you because you are not my sheep” He also told a parable that revealed the real reason that these purposed to kill Him, NOT because they did not recognize Him as the Messiah, but because they DID recognize Him as the heir and wanted Him dead so they could seize His inheritance!

There is ample evidence that this mixing happened, but most are not aware of the radical differences in the prophetic futures of these two groups. YHWH calls Edom a “Destroying Mountain” (nation) and promises to make her most desolate (like mystery Babylon), while Israel is promised a new covenant, a new heart, a new spirit, and new land and a new NAME. There is even a prophesy reminiscent of a scene from the modern Cinderella story Ever After that says “I will cause those who say they are Jews and are not….to come and worship at your feet and know that I have loved you”

Now no one wants to be the bearer of bad news. The young prophet Samuel had the very unenviable first assignment of telling his loved father figure Eli that his house was to be cut off. We really don’t want to think about genocide or a group being condemned because of where they came from…..but it is there, and it doesn’t go away. I am certain that those dividing lines will become clear at some point and He will bring to pass what He has spoken.

Now there were actually three main groups being dealt with in the Apostolic writings.

1. The House of Judah, also called Israel because they were not divorced. these had returned from Babylon and were preserved so Messiah could be born as prophesied under the law and fulfill all that was written concerning him.

2. The wolves/Edomites that the Apostles were sent out among.

3. The “Gentiles” or more accurately the “Nations” of Ephraim who has been cast into the nations and were not being called “Israel” because of being divorced from YHWH.

Now Paul applied prophesies spoken to those ten tribes to these gentiles. He also wrote about the unity that all believers shared in Yeshua Messiah and about How Yeshua had broken down that wall of partition to make of twain one new man. There is neither Jew nor Greek, bond or free, male or female. Now those around Judea knew where those of the diaspora were back then. When Yeshua said “Where I am going you cannot come” they said “ ….will he go to the dispersed among the Greeks and teach the Greeks?”

At this point most should be able to see that the ten tribes were in the group called Gentiles. We know that multitudes followed Yeshua, and that even on Pentecost there must have been those of Judah among those 3000 souls that were baptized meaning there was a remnant at least of Judah in the unified body of Christ. Now here is another little tidbit. When the ten tribes went into Assyrian captivity a portion of the house of Judah went too! This means that a portion or remnant of Judah was also in that group called gentiles!!

My big problem with the current common understanding is that it doesn’t recognize those two portions of Judah that converted and like the prophesy in Ezekiel foretold “became one (Echad/united) in his hand.” The way most believe, those today called Jews represent the tribe of Judah and this unification of the two houses will have a future fulfillment.

I get chills when I read that just ten years after the crucifixion there were ARMIES in Europe marching under the cross. Those disciples did as instructed and took the good news to the “Lost sheep of the house of Israel” (including part of the house of Judah) and they HEARD the message and FOLLOWED!

In the other thread there was a passage in Isaiah mentioned as referencing a “third bride” but it is talking about the same people groups. What jumped out at me was what He said He would do to those that did NOT come when He called. “I will appoint them to slaughter….because they did not come…..and they chose that in which I do not delight” Now those Edomites that did not have ears to hear would have stayed in the synagogues…..and kept right on sacrificing animals which I believe YHWH said He took no pleasure in. (For the record, all of our children that have herded sheep would do the same to sheep that would not follow and went their own way instead!)

So when I put it all together I get that those two houses came together so flawlessly that they were and are no longer seen as two….and people who missed that prophesied name change and are still looking for Jews wrongly try and make those that are really not, a part of latter day Israel/the bride.

Now when people want to call it replacement theology to claim that “The church” is the Israel of today….I feel like showing them all those passages showing that the sheep followed Messiah into this age and are called by a new name, and saying this is FULFILLMENT THEOLOGY! And when people claim that “The Jews are God’s chosen people” or “The Jews are the tribe of Judah” I really would like them to explain to me what happened to the descendants of those that did convert….and where they believe those that “call themselves Jews” are, who’s claim is called blasphemy.

Now in the course of studying this matter over the years there is an interesting passage in Micah that to me indicates that a remnant of Judah WAS left behind in Judaism! It says that “They will smite the judge of Israel on the cheek with a rod…….for this cause will He give them up until such time as she who has labored has brought forth, then shall the remnant be reunited with their brethren” what I get out of that is that there are those (maybe they are those descendants of Judah who’s” blindness in part” persisted?) who’s hearts are right who will wake up to the reality of the kingdom after it is manifested……after the daughter of Zion has labored and fighting with Michael has beat the dragon and gained the first dominion.

I really am the sort that gives individual people of faith the benefit of the doubt and lets them stand or fall in the master’s eyes. I share this in hope that others may dig in and at least study and evaluate the merit of this understanding….because from here the real replacement theology is looking at wolves (anti-christs) ….and calling them sheep.

“Those that are NOT against us are on our side” “Judge by fruits” “You are children of…..the living God” “You are children of…..your father the devil” Whether you believe it is genetic or choice there are two and only two sides. The longer things go the easier it should be to see the fruits.

“Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature” “You will not have gone over the CITIES of Israel before the son of man comes”
 
Now Paul applied prophesies spoken to those ten tribes to these gentiles.

For example?

I get chills when I read that just ten years after the crucifixion there were ARMIES in Europe marching under the cross

Source?


So are you saying that Rom 11:26 has already been fulfilled, and it happened sometime in the past such as the 1st century? Or does this line up with your Micah passage?

until such time as she who has labored has brought forth

Ok this is in Micah 5? This sounds like a passage in revelation. I had the impression it referred to the 1st century when the Christian church, such as it is, came into being.

It's not quite clear to me whether the remnant in v3 is among Judah or amoung the nations.

“You will not have gone over the CITIES of Israel before the son of man comes”

So thats Matt 10:23. What point are you making here? How does this relate to 'go into all the world...every creature' since the context of 10:23 is v5-6 "Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter a city of the Samaritans. But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."?
 
@Joleneakamama thanks for that, but there are clear unfulfilled prophecies that cannot be shoehorned into your perspective. Ezekiel 37 is one.

V. 22, there are two kingdoms, two peoples that come together. If that happened in the first century, identify the kingdoms. Judah and. ......?

V.24, they'll walk together keeping 'even the statutes and the ordinances and live in the land I gave my servant Jacob...'.. this hasn't happened yet, either.

Sure, i don't like everything Judah does, but I don't like much of Christendom, either. Both have to be present at the end of the age or God is a liar. Since I'm not qualified to judge the heart of another, I'll love him and let God sort if out.

Shalom!
 
So are you saying that Rom 11:26 has already been fulfilled, and it happened sometime in the past such as the 1st century? Or does this line up with your Micah passage?
I do believe that as evangelism happened and the good news was shared this was fulfilled. Micah I believe has a future fulfillment because "to the daughter of Zion is to come the first dominion." It does correspond with the war in heaven of revelation.

For an example of prophesy to the ten tribes applied to gentiles Roman's chapter 9.
Even the passage in Ezekiel 37 that talks of gathering the house of Israel says where they will be found....in the nations. And they were broken within 65 years of being taken captive so that "within three score and five years Ephraim will be broken and be not a people" (Isa. 7:8) meaning they were then "qualified" to fulfill the prophesy from Moses quoted by Paul in Roman's 10:19
So thats Matt 10:23. What point are you making here? How does this relate to 'go into all the world...every creature' since the context of 10:23 is v5-6 "Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter a city of the Samaritans. But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."?
The point I was getting at is that to YHWH Jacob's descendants are a nation before Him forever. So the cities they dwell in ...in all the earth....are cities of Israel.
The gospel was to be preached first to Judah, then taken to the lost sheep, then to the world. Samaria was populated with Assyrians after Israel was taken captive. Not many lost sheep there.

The history bit I will get the reference for soon, but Rome sent her most experienced to try and wipe out Christianity.....and was unsuccessful because of the massive number who had accepted Christ.
 
V. 22, there are two kingdoms, two peoples that come together. If that happened in the first century, identify the kingdoms. Judah and. ......?
In the preceding verse YHWH says where He is gathering them from, the nations. According to scripture Ephraim/Israel was broken and lost national identity in 65 years.
Paul identified the two groups coming together. Jews and "Gentiles" ....but he also said some of these gentiles showed evidence of the law written on their hearts. Rom. 2:14-15 since this is a mark of the new covenant how do you decide which parts were fulfilled and which are waiting for later?
Both have to be present at the end of the age or God is a liar.
We believe both are present in the unified body of believers made up of both houses.
 
One of the things to remember is that there are three stages to prophecy being fulfilled. The past, before anything is done. The future, when we look back and see it. And present, which is hard to tell because we are in the midst of it. To me the period between the first and second coming of the present fulfilling is the prophecies that are being spoken about here, particularity Ezekiel 37. We are in the midst of these things being fulfilled and the two brides are coming together presently under the banner of Christ.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One of the things to remember is that there are three stages to prophecy being fulfilled. The past, before anything is done. The future, when we look back and see it. And present, which is hard to tell because we are in the midst of it.
This is why those verses in the apostolic writings that recognize this as being fulfilled then are very interesting.

Do you have scripture or history that would support a current fulfillment of the two houses coming together?
 
Do you have scripture or history that would support a current fulfillment of the two houses coming together?

'current fulfillment' would be hard to prove because its not fulfilled, yet. But because we know that the first coming has already happened and the second coming is going to happen, the process of fulfillment can be assumed. Scriptural references could be made in all the verses that pertain to the process of salvation, sanctification and justification. The fact that we are in place to talk about all this is a sign, at least to me, that the two houses are coming together. They are not currently together but they are coming together.

Once saved you join the family of God, sanctification and justification determine your position, which part of the temple you are.
 
Then how do you see Romans 9 and Paul applying Hosea (Osee) to these Gentiles? Or the past tense nature of Eph. 2:14?
You can see a bunch of translations at once right here.
https://biblehub.com/ephesians/2-14.htm

As far as God is concerned everything is complete.

Matthew 6:9 “This, then, is how you should pray:“ ‘Our Father in heaven,hallowed be your name,10your kingdom come,your will be done,on earth as it is in heaven.

Psalm 110:1 Of David. A psalm. The LORD says to my lord: "Sit at my right hand until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet."

As far as we are concerned, since the Son of God has not returned yet to claim His right to ownership, we have a way to go. Until death is conquered, individually and corporately, we are still in transition. But as far as God, or more accuratlty, we are concerned its all just a matter of time.

(Remember, these are just my views. I am not making any dogmatic statements and they can be changed if someone can show me a better way)
 
Micah I believe has a future fulfillment because "to the daughter of Zion is to come the first dominion." It does correspond with the war in heaven of revelation.

I don't understand that. Not saying you're wrong, I just don't follow.

Both have to be present at the end of the age or God is a liar

Which prophecy are you speaking of here?

Ezekiel 37 is one.

V. 22, there are two kingdoms, two peoples that come together. If that happened in the first century, identify the kingdoms. Judah and. ......?

V.24, they'll walk together keeping 'even the statutes and the ordinances and live in the land I gave my servant Jacob...'.. this hasn't happened yet, either.

That seems like a pretty clear prophecy of the church to me. v1-14 (and esp. v14) were fulfilled in Matthew 27:52-54. v15-28 also looks like a prophecy of the nations and Judah being joined in the church.

Your second kingdom is "children of Israel from among the nations, wherever they have gone". That is the second stick "or all the house of Israel" of v16. Which is why Paul was sent to the Gentiles.

As to v24...yes it has: John 14:15.

Or the past tense nature of Eph. 2:14?
You can see a bunch of translations at once right here.
https://biblehub.com/ephesians/2-14.htm

That's a pretty clear statement of the fulfillment of Ez 37:15-28.

Ez 37:15-17 is also a martial metaphor describing the same thing Paul describes in Rom 11 using an agricultural metaphor.
 
Last edited:
A very interesting perspective is gained by studying the occurrences and passages about wolves in the OT. Specifically the ravening wolves or evening wolves.

I do agree that the Romans in type are associated with wolves by history and their Edom connection, but in these passages, it seems that the wolves mentioned are referring to someone/thing else.
 
V. 22, there are two kingdoms, two peoples that come together. If that happened in the first century, identify the kingdoms. Judah and. ......?

The other kingdom was the ten tribes that had been scattered in the nations. According to prophesy Ephraim/Samaria/Israel was to be broken and "not a people" and this is why YHWH said through Moses that He would bring them to jealousy with those that were not a people.....provoke them with a foolish nation. You have to ignore those prophetic aspects to insist that tribes or a "nation" as such is going to ever be "found" or joined to the house of Judah.
This is why when Paul talks about grace that was prophesied to come to you (gentiles) and applies prophesies spoken by Hosea to these gentiles it is meaningful.

V.24, they'll walk together keeping 'even the statutes and the ordinances and live in the land I gave my servant Jacob...'.. this hasn't happened yet, either.
Maybe you have just adopted a pharisee view that does not see the fulfillment. Consider that YHWH promised Jacob that a nation and company of nations would come from him. While being called Israel or house of Israel and house of Judah they only made two nations. But the redeemed and reconciled houses now called Christians have become the christian west, been tremendously blessed, and been a blessing to all the earth physically and spiritually through sharing the good news.
There has never existed another nation better fitting the descriptive phrase "a company of nations" then these united States of America. We have 50 countries in one. 50 different flags, laws that vary from state to state, and before you discount the idea consider the passage in Deut. V8
When the most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when he separated the sons of Adam, he set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of Israel.
Even if you render that sons of God instead of children of Israel it still fits the redeemed houses of Israel. Hosea 1 "in the place it was said to them you are not my people it shall be said you are the sons of the living God"
Now consider Gen 49:10 where it tells that the gathering of the people will be to Shiloh. There are also verses like the one where the prophet tells David "moreover I will appoint a place for my people....and they will move no more" this was while they were living in the promised land and so these like the many passages that speak of a new land should cause us to look for the land that is described in Ezekiel, rather then try to fit Israel back into the old land that Jesus said was left to them DESOLATE like Shiloh......and for the same reason. The people thought the ark would save them.....and trusted in the temple.

Here are some descriptive verses in Ezekiel 38 v8
After many days thou (Gog and Magog) shalt be visited: in the latter years thou shalt come into the land that is brought back from the sword, and is gathered out of many people, against the mountains of Israel, which have been always waste: but it is brought forth out of the nations, and they shall dwell safely all of them.....11 and 12
11And thou shalt say, I will go up to the land of unwalled villages; I will go to them that are at rest, that dwell safely, all of them dwelling without walls, and having neither bars nor gates, 12To take a spoil, and to take a prey; to turn thine hand upon the desolate places that are now inhabited, and upon the people that are gathered out of the nations, which have gotten cattle and goods, that dwell in the midst of the land.

This fits the states to a tee including the term "mountains of Israel" mountains in prophesy are nations. Read what YHWH calls Edom to see. He calls them a destroying mountain.
Many of those descriptors can never fit the old land. But if you want to see a painful example of someone trying, you can read this article. The author has 14 major things that he suggests may happen before "Israel" will be in the condition described by Ezekiel and the stage is set for Gog and Magog.

I love this quote and admonition. I will leave you will the end to his article.

“The only certain barrier to truth is the presumption you already have it.” Our challenge is to keep an open mind and study diligently, continually reexamining the numerous presuppositions that tend to blind us all. We are, indeed, entering one of the most exciting times in the history of the Planet Earth! May the Holy Spirit be your personal guide as you continue your “treasure hunt” of searching the Holy Scriptures to prove that these things are so!
 
@Joleneakamama … I agree!! Christians are largely the house of Israel. I strongly disagree that the prophesied land we would get is the US of A. That is eisegesis of a special kind. I quoted for you Ezekiel 37:24. Maybe you missed the part that said that 'My Servant David will lead them...[ in ] the Land I gave My servant Jacob...' Unless you know something about the history of the North American continent and Jacob's life evidencing that God gave him this land, you are DOA.

Fact: Israel has NEVER occupied the whole of the land God gave Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. That Land stretches from the Euphrates to the Nile, the Mediterranean to Bahrain. HUGE....HUGE. There is room for 500 million people, a 'remnant' of epic proportions. The land area is the size of 2/3rds the US... Lush, green. Restored. Oil laden. Rich... most resources are untapped!!
 
One of the things that is not considered because it doesn't fit the normal Zionist view of the return to the land of palistine is the information that I brought up earlier in regards to the clay pots, that Jerusalem is destroyed beyond habitation at some point. That must indicate that there is another land that God's people must occupy. Whether it's the US or not I don't know, but it does seem to have a place and surely is a blessing to the world.
 
Fact: Israel has NEVER occupied the whole of the land God gave Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. That Land stretches from the Euphrates to the Nile, the Mediterranean to Bahrain.
Their possession of that land was conditional.
Jer. 7:1
1The word that came to Jeremiah from the LORD, saying, 2Stand in the gate of the LORD'S house, and proclaim there this word, and say, Hear the word of the LORD, all ye of Judah, that enter in at these gates to worship the LORD. 3Thus saith the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel, Amend your ways and your doings, and I will cause you to dwell in this place. 4Trust ye not in lying words, saying, The temple of the LORD, The temple of the LORD, The temple of the LORD, are these. 5For if ye throughly amend your ways and your doings; if ye throughly execute judgment between a man and his neighbour; 6If ye oppress not the stranger, the fatherless, and the widow, and shed not innocent blood in this place, neither walk after other gods to your hurt: 7Then will I cause you to dwell in this place, in the land that I gave to your fathers, for ever and ever......v11
11Is this house, which is called by my name, become a den of robbers in your eyes? Behold, even I have seen it, saith the LORD. (Yeshua quoted this when He cleansed the temple indicating they did not reform) here is the judgement v12 But go ye now unto my place which was in Shiloh, where I set my name at the first, and see what I did to it for the wickedness of my people Israel. 13And now, because ye have done all these works, saith the LORD, and I spake unto you, rising up early and speaking, but ye heard not; and I called you, but ye answered not; 14Therefore will I do unto this house, which is called by my name, wherein ye trust, and unto the place which I gave to you and to your fathers, as I have done to Shiloh. 15And I will cast you out of my sight, as I have cast out all your brethren, even the whole seed of Ephraim.

Yeshua was surely innocent blood, and He stood over Jerusalem and spoke the judgment "Your house is left unto you desolate" before He was crucified.
So unless you can show where YHWH ever went back to Shiloh, you have a problem. Then too there is innocent blood being shed there now in an attempt to take back that land.....and that is NOT prophesied. He said countless times NEW LAND! What do you do with those verses?
 
Okay, how many 'new land' verses are there? List them. I want to look at the original language and the context for each.
 
I don't know if this is all of them, but these are some of the own land/new land
references I am aware of. Isa 14:1, Jer 23:8, Eze 34:13+25-28, 36:24, 37:14+21, 39:28
 
I don't know if this is all of them, but these are some of the own land/new land
references I am aware of. Isa 14:1, Jer 23:8, Eze 34:13+25-28, 36:24, 37:14+21, 39:28
Sorry @Joleneakamama , a very quick simple reading of every one of those passages immediately points to Israel. It is not even possible, within context, to read in any place other than Israel. Example, you cite Ezekiel 37:14 & 21. Well, keep reading to Eze. 37:25 and God clearly says, 'They (the house of Israel and the house of Judah, the two sticks that are one in His hand) will live on the land that I gave to Jacob My servant, in which your fathers lived...' It does not get any clearer than that. If you read anything besides Israel into that passage you are eisegetically changing the Word of God and are profoundly wrong. And, as clear as that passage is, it is a litmus passage.

I'm betting my whole life and ministerial existence on Israel. The Messiah is returning, and it is to the Mount of Olives, just east of the future location of the Temple. By God's grace, may I be standing in Zion when He comes!
 
I'm betting my whole life and ministerial existence on Israel. The Messiah is returning, and it is to the Mount of Olives, just east of the future location of the Temple. By God's grace, may I be standing in Zion when He comes!

Well that took an odd turn.
 
Back
Top