• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

It's a shame this will be Socially acceptable and Polygyny won't

Weird: that Sarah can't see it.

From the website: so Sarah can see the description.

AFMAMH got in there between us, ;) so it's not obvious that I was responding to Sarah. I didn't notice that or I would have quoted Sarah in my reply.
 
Sounds interesting. It's not an unachievable price when a few families get together. And there are plenty of agricultural options, the cold winters can be used for natural weed control making permaculture work well. But we're past the peak of the warming cycle and are looking down the barrel of 200 years of cooling if history is any guide, which it is, so south would probably be a better option for long-term food production. On the other hand, if you can survive the conditions and want to avoid the crowding and conflict that may occur over prime warm land, north might be perfect...
 
my thought was this: "odd" groups do better settling where no one else wants to be

Also, people following God do not seem to find it as difficult to live/farm/exist in more severe conditions
 
wow. mongoose has many unseemly definitions in the urban dictionary
.... but i digress

i also learn a lot around here :confused:
 
It's just plain more acceptable because the couple is still "monogamous" in the eyes of the world. It fits the expected model while applauding them for being creative.
 
How'd that work out for the Mormons?
 
ginger2 said:
wow. mongoose has many unseemly definitions in the urban dictionary
.... but i digress

i also learn a lot around here :confused:
Click to expand...
So I had to look it up.
Oh my goodness ....... ignorance definitely was bliss.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top