I wasn't sure where to post this, so I will put it here.
At work today, I was talking with two coworkers. Both are believers. One asked me if my wife and I were planning to have more children. I told him that for various reasons, my wife's factory had been shut down. I then joked and added that unless I found a concubine, there would be no more little Mojos gracing the faces of the earth. They both looked at me a little stunned.
Later in the day, I made sure to go back and talk to them. They are run of the mill evangelical believers with no real counter cultural leanings that I know of. I essentially lamented that we as believers have to feel shame or caution when mentioning things that the scriptures don't blush to mention.
To my surprise, they both said that it was only because of changing cultural differences. One said it must have been the Puritans that made it shameful. The other said that when he reads the NT, he only sees the prohibition for leaders....everyone else is fine to do as they please.
I expected long justifications for the shocked looks earlier in the day. They were mainly shocked that I would dare bring it up, not shocked at the concept.
I wonder just how many average Joe church members would answer so freely if given a private survey. Is there maybe a silent majority?
At work today, I was talking with two coworkers. Both are believers. One asked me if my wife and I were planning to have more children. I told him that for various reasons, my wife's factory had been shut down. I then joked and added that unless I found a concubine, there would be no more little Mojos gracing the faces of the earth. They both looked at me a little stunned.
Later in the day, I made sure to go back and talk to them. They are run of the mill evangelical believers with no real counter cultural leanings that I know of. I essentially lamented that we as believers have to feel shame or caution when mentioning things that the scriptures don't blush to mention.
To my surprise, they both said that it was only because of changing cultural differences. One said it must have been the Puritans that made it shameful. The other said that when he reads the NT, he only sees the prohibition for leaders....everyone else is fine to do as they please.
I expected long justifications for the shocked looks earlier in the day. They were mainly shocked that I would dare bring it up, not shocked at the concept.
I wonder just how many average Joe church members would answer so freely if given a private survey. Is there maybe a silent majority?