• Biblical Families is not a dating website. It is a forum to discuss issues relating to marriage and the Bible, and to offer guidance and support, not to find a wife. Click here for more information.

Support Conversation with messenger friend

Edward

Seasoned Member
Real Person
Male
Good morning Brothers and Sisters, the below is my reply to my messenger friend, I would your 2 cents, I just want to make sure I am going about it correctly. So here it is, they will be separated by Tom said and Edward says.

Tom said:
Righteous Job, a man who had one wife, refused to even consider marrying a second wife to the point of making a covenant with his eyes so that he would not "look upon a young woman" (Heb. #1330 "Bethulah" meaning "virgin")

Edward says:

Tom this is basic marriage 101, a man can choose to have only one wife or he can choose to have multiple wives. The choice is up to him.

Tom said:

Job 31:1-4 I have made a covenant with my eyes; Why then should I look upon a young woman? 2 For what is the allotment of Elohim from above, And the inheritance of the Almighty from on high? 3 Is it not destruction for the wicked, And disaster for the workers of iniquity? 4 Does He not see my ways, And count all my steps?

Edward says:

Job 31:1-4 KJV I made a covenant with mine eyes; why then should I think upon a maid? (2) For what portion of God is there from above? and what inheritance of the Almighty from on high? (3) Is not destruction to the wicked? and a strange punishment to the workers of iniquity? (4) Doth not he see my ways, and count all my steps?

First off I would like to point out that there is a BIG deference between “think”kjv and “look” your version. Your version has look so I will go with that below.

Tom said:

Why would Job keep his eyes from looking at virgins if he could take a second wife any old time?

Edward says: The answer to your question is in the first part of verse 1...

yours, I have made a covenant with my eyes;

mine, I made a covenant with mine eyes;

Tom said:

She must not have wanted that and he knew how serious a matter it was to sin against his wife.

Edward says:

Job made a covenant and if he broke that covenant it would be a sin, not only against his wife but also against YaHWeH.

Tom said:

Understanding the importance of this also clears up Yahushua's statements in light of polygamy. We know a man cannot divorce his wife for any reason and marry another. But if polygamy were acceptable in all cases, he could simply marry an additional wife rather than divorcing the first one.. or divorce the first wife after marrying the second wife! And, in fact, if polygamy were acceptable in all cases, divorce and remarriage would not be adultery at all. It would just be polygamy!

Edward says:

A man can/should NOT do what is a direct violation of Torah.

I am GLAD you mentioned Yahshua, after all He IS like His Father YaHWeH who in Ezk 23 protrays Himself with two WIVES and Yahshua the bridegroom in Matthew 25 takes 5 FIVE virgins... Matthew 25:10 KJV And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage: and the door was shut.

And NO they were NOT bridesmaids, bridesmaids do NOT get shut in with the bridegroom.

Tom said:

We should remember that there is about a 50/50 chance of a child being born a boy or a girl. For this reason, there is usually an equal number of men and women in society. In the United States, 49.12% of the population is male and 50.88% of the population is female (2002 data). If we lived in a society where there were significantly more women than men, I could see some legitimacy for a man having more than one wife rather than multitudes of women being sentenced to a life of celibacy. This was often the case in ancient times because of so many men dying in various wars. But if we live in a society where the number of men are nearly the same as the number of women, a man marrying one wife could potentially prevent another man from producing a seed of Elohim. It seems that these things should be taken into consideration as well.

Edward says:

since you brought numbers into this, I looked at the numbers. and WOW!!!!

First lets look at your 2002 numbers. According those percentages 1.76% of women WILL be sentenced to a life of celibacy.

Now lets look, starting in 2010 and coming to 2020. In 2010 there is 157.97 mil. Females and 151.77 mil. Males with a difference of 6,200,000 WOMEN being sentenced to a life of celibacy.

With the steady increase of women from 2010 to 2020 we are now at 2020 with 169.22 mil. Females and 162.59 mil. Males with a difference of 6,630,000 WOMEN being sentenced to a life of celibacy.

BUT with Polygyny a man having 2 or more wives, these women have a chance at marriage. For us Torah observant men we get to look forward to this prophecy... Isaiah 4:1 KJV And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, We will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel: only let us be called by thy name, to take away our reproach.

Tom said:

Also, it is a sin to do things, even lawful things, to cause others to stumble. If you are walking around town with multiple wives l, you WILL ruin your witness.

Edward says:

Tom I am assuming you are referring to this passage... 1 Corinthians 8:9 KJV But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak.

This particular passage is talking about idols and eating things that are offered to idols. Please read the whole chapter. Saying walking around with multiple wives as you put it “you WILL ruin your witness” Is like saying I will ruin my witness with a large, modest YaH fearing family. Because society and the Church thinks we should only have 1 or 2 children.

Remember Tom YaHWeH would never regulate sin... Exodus 21:10 KJV If he take him another wife; her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish.

And if having more than one wife why in the world would YaHWeH tell David...

2 Samuel 12:8 KJV And I gave thee thy master's house, and thy master's wives into thy bosom, and gave thee the house of Israel and of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would moreover have given unto thee such and such things.

Roughly translated meaning all you had to do is ask and I would have given you more wives. Remember David was only rebuked for the sin of Uriah the Hittite not for having multiple wives.

1 Kings 15:5 KJV Because David did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, and turned not aside from any thing that he commanded him all the days of his life, save only in the matter of Uriah the Hittite.

The above verse would have been a great time to say polygyny was a sin but all that was said is David did that which was right in the sight of YaHWeH.
 
he could simply marry an additional wife rather than divorcing the first one.. or divorce the first wife after marrying the second wife! And, in fact, if polygamy were acceptable in all cases, divorce and remarriage would not be adultery at all.

It is important to understand that verse properly. Christ is actually preaching against serial monogamy, not polygamy. He doesn't condemn taking a second wife, but divorcing in order to take a second wife. In other words it's a condemnation of the monogamy; because monogamy says they can't marry the second women they love unless they divorce their first. It's a condemnation of the churches current practice. And if he claims, "we don't believe in divorce" nail him to the wall on that because the vast majority of Christians divorce at substantially the same rate as the world and excuse women divorcing despite zero justification in scripture.

Besides that the most important points are: 1) no specific condemnation of poly in either the Old or New and 2) God's endorsement of it implicitly (law regulating) and explicitly (leverite marriage and david)

That said, the most important thing if you want to reach this one person is to understand his root objection. Why does HE oppose it. You could run around all day with various specific justifications but what is at the source of his objection? You might ask, "What is your core objection?" or "What would it take to change your mind on polygamy?" That answer to the last would be enlightening.
 
I bet I can guess Tom W's last name.... lol.

Several considerations: even with the disparity in numbers of men and women, that does nit also account for homosexuals, jailed, bachelors, and unfit men...

If monogamy is God's ideal, why did He choose less than ideal for Himself? Heckuva example.

If more than one wife is a bad witness, 'splain Jacob! 50% of Israel did not come from Leah!
 
Posting an article on my blog, probably later today, titled Breaking Torah! (Let me count the ways...).

It will list the ways we violate Torah when we hold and promote monogamy-only.. 14 that icount so far including blasphemy, idolatry, adding, subtracting, oppressing widows and orphans, etc... not pretty at all. Will be verysobering for the Torah community.
 
Job 31:1-4 I have made a covenant with my eyes; Why then should I look upon a young woman?

This is an interesting argument and the first time I have seen it in a polygamy debate.

There is no indication that all men should make such a covenant or that God approved of this. See Colossians 2:23.

Why would Job keep his eyes from looking at virgins if he could take a second wife any old time?

One reason may be that Job did not want another wife and so made this covenant to avoid fornication.

We can only speculate because it does not say why Job made this vow.

She must not have wanted that and he knew how serious a matter it was to sin against his wife.

If he sinned against his wife what sin was it?

Understanding the importance of this also clears up Yahushua's statements in light of polygamy. We know a man cannot divorce his wife for any reason and marry another. But if polygamy were acceptable in all cases, he could simply marry an additional wife rather than divorcing the first one..

Indeed, he can. The men at the time knew this. They did not want to pay for two wives.

or divorce the first wife after marrying the second wife!

No. Clearly Jesus is teaching against divorce (and not polygamy).

And, in fact, if polygamy were acceptable in all cases, divorce and remarriage would not be adultery at all. It would just be polygamy!

Indeed some call the divorce and remarriage cycle "serial polygamy", but divorce is clearly against God's will and adultery is a woman having more than one man. The reverse is not adultery.

I am GLAD you mentioned Yahshua, after all He IS like His Father YaHWeH who in Ezk 23 protrays Himself with two WIVES

Ignoring your best points when there is no possible rebuttle is a good debating tactic on his part. Just bring it up again if you need to. "I noticed that you ignored my point about..."

We should remember that there is about a 50/50 chance of a child being born a boy or a girl. For this reason, there is usually an equal number of men and women in society. In the United States, 49.12% of the population is male and 50.88% of the population is female (2002 data). If we lived in a society where there were significantly more women than men, I could see some legitimacy for a man having more than one wife rather than multitudes of women being sentenced to a life of celibacy. This was often the case in ancient times because of so many men dying in various wars. But if we live in a society where the number of men are nearly the same as the number of women, a man marrying one wife could potentially prevent another man from producing a seed of Elohim. It seems that these things should be taken into consideration as well.

You veered into debating sociology instead of the Bible. I would just steer it back to the Bible.

Also, it is a sin to do things, even lawful things, to cause others to stumble. If you are walking around town with multiple wives l, you WILL ruin your witness.

Point out to him that this is the weaker brother argument, and the weaker brother (who has less knowledge of the truth) is the one who is offended.

The weaker brother argument is a temporary fix until the truth can be known in maturity. The long term solution is to teach the truth to the weaker brother.
 
I bet I can guess Tom W's last name

Nope, but he is eliyah.com if that helps. He's a great brother in Messiah and a good friend, this is the first time he has replied to me about my memes.
 
This is an interesting argument and the first time I have seen it in a polygamy debate.

There is no indication that all men should make such a covenant or that God approved of this. See Colossians 2:23.



One reason may be that Job did not want another wife and so made this covenant to avoid fornication.

We can only speculate because it does not say why Job made this vow.



If he sinned against his wife what sin was it?



Indeed, he can. The men at the time knew this. They did not want to pay for two wives.



No. Clearly Jesus is teaching against divorce (and not polygamy).



Indeed some call the divorce and remarriage cycle "serial polygamy", but divorce is clearly against God's will and adultery is a woman having more than one man. The reverse is not adultery.



Ignoring your best points when there is no possible rebuttle is a good debating tactic on his part. Just bring it up again if you need to. "I noticed that you ignored my point about..."



You veered into debating sociology instead of the Bible. I would just steer it back to the Bible.



Point out to him that this is the weaker brother argument, and the weaker brother (who has less knowledge of the truth) is the one who is offended.

The weaker brother argument is a temporary fix until the truth can be known in maturity. The long term solution is to teach the truth to the weaker brother.

The Tom said, IS the FIRST time he has ever talked to me about Polygyny, so this is my first time ever replying to him.
I'm guessing he has seen ALL my pro poly meme's on FB lol and just decided to message me for the first time.
 
@cnystrom I'm not sure noticed the "Tom said" through out the post and the "Edward says".

Mine is in reply to what he said to me for the first time. So that is why you see the reply's that I have given.
 
Tom's spotted something very important here all by himself, that is well worth bringing back to his attention:
Understanding the importance of this also clears up Yahushua's statements in light of polygamy. We know a man cannot divorce his wife for any reason and marry another. But if polygamy were acceptable in all cases, he could simply marry an additional wife rather than divorcing the first one.. or divorce the first wife after marrying the second wife! And, in fact, if polygamy were acceptable in all cases, divorce and remarriage would not be adultery at all. It would just be polygamy!
Precisely. Yeshua is speaking against divorce and remarriage. He was not speaking against polygamy, as Tom has pointed out - polygamy is actually a completely valid alternative in this situation that does not at all contradict Yeshua's words. Tom is right. Congratulate him for figuring it out!

"or divorce the first wife after marrying the second" - this goes against other teachings against divorce, so is wrong. The rest of his statement is a bit messed up as he hasn't thought it through properly - divorce and remarriage is exactly what is being prohibited in this passage, and is by definition not polygamy but serial monogamy. There's a lot of further discussion to be had here. But he's already acknowledged the fundamental point from which you can pivot him towards truth.
 

3. DIShonors our fathers (and mothers), Abraham, Jacob, Moses, David, Gideon, all righteous men.. Both Deuteronomy 5 and Exodus 20 teach that we are to honor our father and mother. How much more should we honor Abraham and Jacob? How about Sarah, Leah and Rachel as well as mothers of Israel, Zilpah and Bilhah? Speaking negatively of their plural marriages, as if God didn’t approve, is highly dishonoring. The fact is, God blessed them in those marriages and blessed the offspring, even if the circumstances were not ‘ideal’ by western Christian standards!! See Genesis 16:10; 30:4-6, 17-18.

This one is perhaps most profound to me. When discussing polygyny, it's often discussed as lustful and sexually deviant. When pointing to the patriarchs and Jacob/Israel, the usual response is "well, God blesses mans errors too".

Really?
 
"What is your core objection?" or "What would it take to change your mind on polygamy?"
I added it to my reply, we shall see what he says.
 
Good morning Brothers and Sisters, the below is my reply to my messenger friend, I would your 2 cents, I just want to make sure I am going about it correctly. So here it is, they will be separated by Tom said and Edward says.

Tom said:
Righteous Job, a man who had one wife, refused to even consider marrying a second wife to the point of making a covenant with his eyes so that he would not "look upon a young woman" (Heb. #1330 "Bethulah" meaning "virgin")

Edward says:

Tom this is basic marriage 101, a man can choose to have only one wife or he can choose to have multiple wives. The choice is up to him.

Tom said:

Job 31:1-4 I have made a covenant with my eyes; Why then should I look upon a young woman? 2 For what is the allotment of Elohim from above, And the inheritance of the Almighty from on high? 3 Is it not destruction for the wicked, And disaster for the workers of iniquity? 4 Does He not see my ways, And count all my steps?

Edward says:

Job 31:1-4 KJV I made a covenant with mine eyes; why then should I think upon a maid? (2) For what portion of God is there from above? and what inheritance of the Almighty from on high? (3) Is not destruction to the wicked? and a strange punishment to the workers of iniquity? (4) Doth not he see my ways, and count all my steps?

First off I would like to point out that there is a BIG deference between “think”kjv and “look” your version. Your version has look so I will go with that below.

Tom said:

Why would Job keep his eyes from looking at virgins if he could take a second wife any old time?

Edward says: The answer to your question is in the first part of verse 1...

yours, I have made a covenant with my eyes;

mine, I made a covenant with mine eyes;

Tom said:

She must not have wanted that and he knew how serious a matter it was to sin against his wife.

Edward says:

Job made a covenant and if he broke that covenant it would be a sin, not only against his wife but also against YaHWeH.

Tom said:

Understanding the importance of this also clears up Yahushua's statements in light of polygamy. We know a man cannot divorce his wife for any reason and marry another. But if polygamy were acceptable in all cases, he could simply marry an additional wife rather than divorcing the first one.. or divorce the first wife after marrying the second wife! And, in fact, if polygamy were acceptable in all cases, divorce and remarriage would not be adultery at all. It would just be polygamy!

Edward says:

A man can/should NOT do what is a direct violation of Torah.

I am GLAD you mentioned Yahshua, after all He IS like His Father YaHWeH who in Ezk 23 protrays Himself with two WIVES and Yahshua the bridegroom in Matthew 25 takes 5 FIVE virgins... Matthew 25:10 KJV And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage: and the door was shut.

And NO they were NOT bridesmaids, bridesmaids do NOT get shut in with the bridegroom.

Tom said:

We should remember that there is about a 50/50 chance of a child being born a boy or a girl. For this reason, there is usually an equal number of men and women in society. In the United States, 49.12% of the population is male and 50.88% of the population is female (2002 data). If we lived in a society where there were significantly more women than men, I could see some legitimacy for a man having more than one wife rather than multitudes of women being sentenced to a life of celibacy. This was often the case in ancient times because of so many men dying in various wars. But if we live in a society where the number of men are nearly the same as the number of women, a man marrying one wife could potentially prevent another man from producing a seed of Elohim. It seems that these things should be taken into consideration as well.

Edward says:

since you brought numbers into this, I looked at the numbers. and WOW!!!!

First lets look at your 2002 numbers. According those percentages 1.76% of women WILL be sentenced to a life of celibacy.

Now lets look, starting in 2010 and coming to 2020. In 2010 there is 157.97 mil. Females and 151.77 mil. Males with a difference of 6,200,000 WOMEN being sentenced to a life of celibacy.

With the steady increase of women from 2010 to 2020 we are now at 2020 with 169.22 mil. Females and 162.59 mil. Males with a difference of 6,630,000 WOMEN being sentenced to a life of celibacy.

BUT with Polygyny a man having 2 or more wives, these women have a chance at marriage. For us Torah observant men we get to look forward to this prophecy... Isaiah 4:1 KJV And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, We will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel: only let us be called by thy name, to take away our reproach.

Tom said:

Also, it is a sin to do things, even lawful things, to cause others to stumble. If you are walking around town with multiple wives l, you WILL ruin your witness.

Edward says:

Tom I am assuming you are referring to this passage... 1 Corinthians 8:9 KJV But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak.

This particular passage is talking about idols and eating things that are offered to idols. Please read the whole chapter. Saying walking around with multiple wives as you put it “you WILL ruin your witness” Is like saying I will ruin my witness with a large, modest YaH fearing family. Because society and the Church thinks we should only have 1 or 2 children.

Remember Tom YaHWeH would never regulate sin... Exodus 21:10 KJV If he take him another wife; her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish.

And if having more than one wife why in the world would YaHWeH tell David...

2 Samuel 12:8 KJV And I gave thee thy master's house, and thy master's wives into thy bosom, and gave thee the house of Israel and of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would moreover have given unto thee such and such things.

Roughly translated meaning all you had to do is ask and I would have given you more wives. Remember David was only rebuked for the sin of Uriah the Hittite not for having multiple wives.

1 Kings 15:5 KJV Because David did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, and turned not aside from any thing that he commanded him all the days of his life, save only in the matter of Uriah the Hittite.

The above verse would have been a great time to say polygyny was a sin but all that was said is David did that which was right in the sight of YaHWeH.

Just one little thing about Job’s covenant with his eyes. In context, Job is trying to justify himself before God and then God rebukes him. Job’s covenant with his eyes not to look on a virgin, was his own rule, not a rule God gave him.
 
Last edited:
Good morning Brothers, thank you for your input. I DID add some of your comments to my reply and sent it to him this morning. I prey his eyes will be opened to the truth. I will keep you posted.
 
Good morning Brothers and Sisters, the below is my reply to my messenger friend, I would your 2 cents, I just want to make sure I am going about it correctly. So here it is, they will be separated by Tom said and Edward says.

Tom said:
Righteous Job, a man who had one wife, refused to even consider marrying a second wife to the point of making a covenant with his eyes so that he would not "look upon a young woman" (Heb. #1330 "Bethulah" meaning "virgin")

Edward says:

Tom this is basic marriage 101, a man can choose to have only one wife or he can choose to have multiple wives. The choice is up to him.

Tom said:

Job 31:1-4 I have made a covenant with my eyes; Why then should I look upon a young woman? 2 For what is the allotment of Elohim from above, And the inheritance of the Almighty from on high? 3 Is it not destruction for the wicked, And disaster for the workers of iniquity? 4 Does He not see my ways, And count all my steps?

Edward says:

Job 31:1-4 KJV I made a covenant with mine eyes; why then should I think upon a maid? (2) For what portion of God is there from above? and what inheritance of the Almighty from on high? (3) Is not destruction to the wicked? and a strange punishment to the workers of iniquity? (4) Doth not he see my ways, and count all my steps?

First off I would like to point out that there is a BIG deference between “think”kjv and “look” your version. Your version has look so I will go with that below.

Tom said:

Why would Job keep his eyes from looking at virgins if he could take a second wife any old time?

Edward says: The answer to your question is in the first part of verse 1...

yours, I have made a covenant with my eyes;

mine, I made a covenant with mine eyes;

Tom said:

She must not have wanted that and he knew how serious a matter it was to sin against his wife.

Edward says:

Job made a covenant and if he broke that covenant it would be a sin, not only against his wife but also against YaHWeH.

Tom said:

Understanding the importance of this also clears up Yahushua's statements in light of polygamy. We know a man cannot divorce his wife for any reason and marry another. But if polygamy were acceptable in all cases, he could simply marry an additional wife rather than divorcing the first one.. or divorce the first wife after marrying the second wife! And, in fact, if polygamy were acceptable in all cases, divorce and remarriage would not be adultery at all. It would just be polygamy!

Edward says:

A man can/should NOT do what is a direct violation of Torah.

I am GLAD you mentioned Yahshua, after all He IS like His Father YaHWeH who in Ezk 23 protrays Himself with two WIVES and Yahshua the bridegroom in Matthew 25 takes 5 FIVE virgins... Matthew 25:10 KJV And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage: and the door was shut.

And NO they were NOT bridesmaids, bridesmaids do NOT get shut in with the bridegroom.

Tom said:

We should remember that there is about a 50/50 chance of a child being born a boy or a girl. For this reason, there is usually an equal number of men and women in society. In the United States, 49.12% of the population is male and 50.88% of the population is female (2002 data). If we lived in a society where there were significantly more women than men, I could see some legitimacy for a man having more than one wife rather than multitudes of women being sentenced to a life of celibacy. This was often the case in ancient times because of so many men dying in various wars. But if we live in a society where the number of men are nearly the same as the number of women, a man marrying one wife could potentially prevent another man from producing a seed of Elohim. It seems that these things should be taken into consideration as well.

Edward says:

since you brought numbers into this, I looked at the numbers. and WOW!!!!

First lets look at your 2002 numbers. According those percentages 1.76% of women WILL be sentenced to a life of celibacy.

Now lets look, starting in 2010 and coming to 2020. In 2010 there is 157.97 mil. Females and 151.77 mil. Males with a difference of 6,200,000 WOMEN being sentenced to a life of celibacy.

With the steady increase of women from 2010 to 2020 we are now at 2020 with 169.22 mil. Females and 162.59 mil. Males with a difference of 6,630,000 WOMEN being sentenced to a life of celibacy.

BUT with Polygyny a man having 2 or more wives, these women have a chance at marriage. For us Torah observant men we get to look forward to this prophecy... Isaiah 4:1 KJV And in that day seven women shall take hold of one man, saying, We will eat our own bread, and wear our own apparel: only let us be called by thy name, to take away our reproach.

Tom said:

Also, it is a sin to do things, even lawful things, to cause others to stumble. If you are walking around town with multiple wives l, you WILL ruin your witness.

Edward says:

Tom I am assuming you are referring to this passage... 1 Corinthians 8:9 KJV But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak.

This particular passage is talking about idols and eating things that are offered to idols. Please read the whole chapter. Saying walking around with multiple wives as you put it “you WILL ruin your witness” Is like saying I will ruin my witness with a large, modest YaH fearing family. Because society and the Church thinks we should only have 1 or 2 children.

Remember Tom YaHWeH would never regulate sin... Exodus 21:10 KJV If he take him another wife; her food, her raiment, and her duty of marriage, shall he not diminish.

And if having more than one wife why in the world would YaHWeH tell David...

2 Samuel 12:8 KJV And I gave thee thy master's house, and thy master's wives into thy bosom, and gave thee the house of Israel and of Judah; and if that had been too little, I would moreover have given unto thee such and such things.

Roughly translated meaning all you had to do is ask and I would have given you more wives. Remember David was only rebuked for the sin of Uriah the Hittite not for having multiple wives.

1 Kings 15:5 KJV Because David did that which was right in the eyes of the LORD, and turned not aside from any thing that he commanded him all the days of his life, save only in the matter of Uriah the Hittite.

The above verse would have been a great time to say polygyny was a sin but all that was said is David did that which was right in the sight of YaHWeH.
Job is boastng of his righteousness in this passage to prove he doesn’t deserve his treatment at God’s hands. The whole exchange is supposed to demonstrate the worthlessness if man’s righteousness. It’s perfectly acceptable even by New Testament standards for a man to look on maid. Tom (and as gently as I know how to say it brother, you) has completely missed the point of the passage.

Job isn’t relaying God’s instructions in this verse, he’s indicting himself as a self righteous whiner. Tell Tom to stop reading complicated books a verse at a time.
 
Tom (and as gently as I know how to say it brother, you) has completely missed the point of the passage.

TRM you are correct I did miss that point, he was crying.
After all he did lose just about everything and with the help of his friends he started to believe them, and as you put it "he’s indicting himself as a self righteous whiner.".
But I still believe my reply can still apply about a man choosing poly or not.
 
Just so you all know Tom has NOT replied yet and I doubt he will. I will let you know if he does.
 
Back
Top